21/09/2026
Same deposit. Two very different borrowing positions. This is the part that catches people out.
Say you have $250,000 to deploy.
Residential lending will take you to 80 percent, sometimes 90. That deposit reaches an $800,000 house comfortably, maybe more.
Commercial lending sits at 60 to 70 percent. Shorter terms, higher rates, and often a fifteen year amortisation rather than thirty. The same $250,000 reaches something closer to $700,000, and the repayments are structured harder.
So on capacity alone, residential wins.
Then you look at what each one returns. The house nets you roughly 2.4 percent after everything you pay. The commercial asset, on a net lease with the tenant carrying outgoings, nets closer to 6.4.
That is the actual trade. You can buy more house, or you can buy less commercial that pays you substantially more and grows on contracted increases rather than market sentiment.
Neither answer is universally right. It depends on whether you need capital growth or cash flow, how long you can hold, and how much vacancy risk you can absorb without it hurting.
But you cannot make that decision without running both numbers, and almost nobody does.