04/23/2020
Remote work will kill the office tower.
Or so I hear people saying. On the face of it, it seems plausible enough. After all, forced experimentation can change habits.
The 1994-95 MLB strike changed the sports viewing habits of North Americans. The League hasn't recovered its television market-share.
The 2014 disruption of the London Underground forced commuters to find new ways to work. Many travel patterns remained changed even after the Underground re-opened.
So the thinking goes, after this period of forced experimentation, maybe some companies will conclude they can save by shrinking their footprint. As someone who gets paid when real estate transactions happen, that would be a convenient narrative (tenants - sign new leases for right-sized space; landlords - sell your office space before demand shrinks).
However, it's not a narrative that the facts support. Silicone Valley experimented with work from home a decade ago. Google, Yahoo, and IBM now prohibit it.
The research is clear: Staff are more productive in environments they share with their colleagues. That productivity more than pays for the cost of the space.
Rent is usually 5-10% of an employee's cost. A small boost to productivity and the space pays for itself.
https://is.gd/5zn2WS
Breadcrumb Trail LinksLocal NewsColumnistsEgan: The folly of office towers in a time of pandemicAuthor of the article:Kelly EganPublishing date:8 hours ago • 3 minute readHealth Canada's Jeanne Mance building in Tunney's Pasture. Tony Caldwell / Postmedia NetworkArticle SidebarShareCloseShare this...