DT LEGAL FIRM

DT LEGAL FIRM Everybody should know the law all civil and criminal cases and documents are done with here.

04/10/2021

📌 *Marriage is emotionally dead; Husband is directed to pay 25 Lakhs as full and final settlement. SC*

*Divorce – Allegation of cruelty and desertion by wife – Living separately for more than 16 years – Allegations made by wife relate to adultery which was the reason for her moving out of the matrimonial home – Though the wife insisted to live with the husband, no meaningful effort has been made by her for reconciliation – the marriage between the parties is emotionally dead and there is no point in persuading them to live together any more. The marriage between the parties is dissolved. Husband to pay an amount of Rs.25 Lakhs as full and final settlement of all claims.*

Citations : *AIR 2021 SC 4301*

*IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA*

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

*[L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.]*

Civil Appeal No. 5696 of 2021 (@ SLP (C) No.11747 of 2017); September 14, 2021

*SUBHRANSU SARKAR v. INDRANI SARKAR (NEE DAS)*

*O R D E R*

Leave granted.

1. The Appellant married the Respondent on 02.03.1997 and registered the same under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. Thereafter, the marriage was solemnized between the parties on 07.12.2000 under the Hindu rites and customs. Alleging cruelty and desertion by the Respondent, the appellant filed a suit for dissolution of marriage on 05.03.2007 before the District Judge, Alipore. The suit was dismissed, aggrieved by which the Appellant filed an appeal before the High Court of Calcutta. The Respondent did not appear before the High Court. However, the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant upholding the judgment of the Trial Court. The allegation made by the Appellant against the Respondent is that she was insisting on his residing separately from his parents. Also, the Respondent misbehaved with her in-laws and that she was frequently leaving the matrimonial home. The appellant also alleged physical assault by the Respondent when both of them went to Puri and Shillong for holidays. The Respondent resisted the Petition filed for dissolution of marriage by denying the averments made against her. She accused the appellant of adultery and excessive consumption of alcohol. The Trial Court and the High Court refused to accept the contentions of the appellant that he is entitled for divorce by holding that he could not make out a case of cruelty meted out by the Respondent.

2. It was submitted by Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, learned Senior Counsel for the Appellant that the Appellant and Respondent have been living separately for more than 16 years and for all practical purposes the marriage is dead. He relied upon two judgments of this Court in *Sukhendu Das v. Rita Mukherjee, (2017) 9 SCC 632 and Munish Kakkar v. Nidhi Kakkar, (2020) 14 SCC 657* in support of his submission that this Court in exercise of its power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India has dissolved marriages when they are totally unworkable and irretrievable.

3. We have requested Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee to assist this Court as Amicus Curiae on behalf of the Respondent as she did not engage an Advocate. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee informed this Court that the Respondent intends to continue to live with the Appellant. Mr. Mukherjee informed this Court that he spoke to the Respondent several times and the Respondent is not convinced that an unworkable marriage should be put to an end. In *Sukhendu Das v. Rita Mukherjee (supra),* this Court considered a similar situation where the marriage between the parties took place on 19.06.1992 and they were living apart from the year 2000. The Trial Court found that the husband could not prove cruelty by his wife and that he was not entitled for decree of divorce. The judgment of the Trial Court was upheld by the High Court and the same was the subject matter of challenge before this Court. The Respondent failed to appear before this Court in spite of notice being served. By holding that there was an irretrievable breakdown of marriage, this Court dissolved the marriage between the parties therein by observing that they had been living separately for more than 17 years and no useful purpose would be served by compelling them to live together in matrimony.

4. To do complete justice between the parties, this Court in Munish Kakkar v. Nidhi Kakkar (supra) put an end to the bitter matrimonial dispute which lingered on for two decades between the parties therein.

5. The Appellant is a police officer in the State of West Bengal and has made allegation of cruelty and desertion against the Respondent. Though the respondent has insisted that she intends to live with the Appellant, no meaningful effort has been made by her for reconciliation. Allegations made by the Respondent relate to adultery by the Appellant which was the reason for her moving out of the matrimonial home. In spite of the best efforts made by Mr. Mukherjee, the Respondent has insisted that she is not willing for dissolution of the marriage. Mr. Mukherjee has brought to our notice that the Respondent has to take care of her son who is suffering from serious ailments.

6. Having scrutinized the material on record and considering the submissions made by Mr. Nikhil Nayyar and Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, learned Amicus Curiae, without commenting on the merits of the matter, the marriage between the parties is emotionally dead and there is no point in persuading them to live together any more. Therefore, this is a fit case for exercise of jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. The marriage between the parties is dissolved. The Registry is directed to prepare a decree accordingly. Taking note of the submissions made by Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, we direct the Appellant to pay an amount of Rs.25 Lakhs (Rupees Twenty-Five Lakhs) to the Respondent within a period of eight weeks from today. The petition filed by the Respondent under Section 125 Cr. PC for maintenance shall be withdrawn by the Respondent on receipt of the amount of Rs.25 Lakhs. The payment of the aforesaid amount is in full and final settlement of all claims of the Respondent against the Appellant.

7. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

01/07/2021

📌 *Whether husband can be granted divorce on ground of cruelty if wife is making false complaints against him?*

Cruelty can never be defined with exactitude. What is cruelty will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. In the present case, from the facts narrated above, it is apparent that the wife made reckless, defamatory and false accusations against her husband, his family members and colleagues, which would definitely have the effect of lowering his reputation in the eyes of his peers. Mere filing of complaints is not cruelty, if there are justifiable reasons to file the complaints. *Merely because no action is taken on the complaint or after trial the accused is acquitted may not be a ground to treat such accusations of the wife as cruelty within the meaning of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 (for short ‘the Act’). However, if it is found that the allegations are patently false, then there can be no manner of doubt that the said conduct of a spouse levelling false accusations against the other spouse would be an act of cruelty*. In the present case, all the allegations were found to be false. *The petition for divorce filed by the husband under Section 13 of the Act is decreed and the marriage of the parties solemnized on 13.04.1989 is dissolved by a decree of divorce.*

*REPORTABLE*

*IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA*

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10719 OF 2013

*Raj Talreja -Vs- Kavita Talreja*

Dated:April 24, 2017

📌 *Supreme Court has Suo motto extended limitation of all proceedings from 14-3-2021 till further orders*.*We also take ...
18/05/2021

📌 *Supreme Court has Suo motto extended limitation of all proceedings from 14-3-2021 till further orders*.

*We also take judicial notice of the fact that the steep.rise in COVID-19 Virus cases is not limited to Delhi alone but it has engulfed the entire.nation. The extraordinary situation caused by the sudden and second outburst of COVID-19 Virus, thus, requires extraordinary measures to minimize the hardship of litigant–public in all the states. We, therefore, restore the order dated 23rd March 2020 and in continuation of the order dated 8th March, 2021 direct that the period(s) of limitation, as prescribed under any general or special laws in respect of all judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings, whether condonable or not, shall stand extended till further orders. It is further clarified that the period from 14th March 2021 till further orders shall also stand excluded in computing the periods prescribed under Sections 23 (4) and 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay) and termination of proceedings.*

*We have passed this order in exercise of our powers under Article 142 read with Article 141 of the Constitution of India. Hence it shall be a binding order within the meaning of Article 141 on all Courts/Tribunals and Authorities*

*S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A*

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Miscellaneous Application No. 665/2021 in SMW(C) No. 3/2020

IN RE COGNIZANCE FOR EXTENSION OF LIMITATION

Date : 27-04-2021

CORAM :
*HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA*

எல்லாம் வல்ல இறைவனின் அருளால் வெற்றிகரமாக மூன்றாவது ஆண்டில் அடியெடுத்து வைக்கிறோம்..இவன்DT LEGAL FIRMTirupur main branch
18/03/2021

எல்லாம் வல்ல இறைவனின் அருளால் வெற்றிகரமாக மூன்றாவது ஆண்டில் அடியெடுத்து வைக்கிறோம்..
இவன்
DT LEGAL FIRM
Tirupur main branch

10/01/2021

*HC: HIV positive r**e accused cannot be convicted for ‘attempt to murder* ’ [Read Judgment]
Delhi High Court

20 Dec 2020

By : Pranay Lakhanpal

Categories : Latest News Case Analysis

The Delhi high court while hearing a criminal appeal in a r**e case upheld the r**e conviction of the appellant, however, acquitted him for the charge of attempt to murder holding that HIV positive person cannot be liable for an attempt to murder even if sexual in*******se is without the woman’s consent.

The FIR was filed by the appellant’s step-daughter who was allegedly r**ed multiple times by the accused. The prosecutrix made the statement that her step-father forcefully r**ed her multiple times after the demise of her mother when she was 15-years old. Since the accused was HIV positive the prosecutrix was also tested for the disease but her test results came negative. The trial court evaluated all the medical and forensic evidence and statement of the prosecutrix along with other witnesses and convicted the appellant under section 376,313 and 307 of the IPC for r**e, miscarriage, and attempt to murder of the prosecutrix and sentenced him to 25 years imprisonment.

The appellant aggrieved by the trial court’s judgment the accused filed an appeal in the Delhi high court. The counsel for the appellant contended that the prosecutrix has changed her statement under oath due to which her testimony is unreliable and also defended the accused on other charges pleading that the accused be acquitted of all charges.

The single-judge bench of Delhi high court of Justice Vibhu Bakhru upheld the trial court’s conviction under section 376 IPC for r**e after finding that there was enough forensic and medical evidence that corroborated the prosecutrix testimony. However, the court found no sufficient material on record to charge the appellant under section 313IPC for miscarriage and acquitted the appellant for the same.

On the issue of the trial court’s conviction under section 307IPC for an attempt to murder the court held a different view and dictated that such an instance of r**e by an HIV positive patient cannot be seen as an attempt to murder. The court remarked “This Court is unable to subscribe to the aforesaid approach of the learned Trial Court. Merely because the learned Judge was of the view that the Legislature must provide for a higher punishment for non-disclosure of the STI/STD status of the person engaging in sexual activity, does not justify contriving to classify it as an offense entailing a higher punishment.” Regarding the legal implications of the trial court’s judgment the high court held that the learned trial court judge erred in charging the accused with an attempt to murder and commented “that the import of holding so would also mean that any sexual activity by a person infected by HIV is punishable under Section 307 of the IPC, notwithstanding that his or her partner has consented to such sexual activity. This is because the culpable act under Section 307 of the IPC does not cease to be one if the victim of such an act has also consented to the same. If the reasoning adopted by the learned Trial Court is extended further, it would also mean that a healthy person who willingly engages in unprotected sexual in*******se with an HIV positive partner and acquires the said disease as a result thereof that eventually proves fatal, would have committed su***de and, the HIV positive partner would be guilty of abetment of su***de under Section 306 of the IPC if not guilty of committing murder as defined under Section 300 of the IPC.”

Read also : Mask not mandatory if Person is alone in a Vehicle: MoHFW to HC
The court relied on laws of multiple other countries regarding the spread of such disease and held that it might be an aggravating factor while sentencing but there are no specific laws regarding it. The court was of the opinion that the conduct of the accused may not come under the purview of an attempt to murder since there was no intention of killing and the same was also not contended by the prosecution. The court criticizing the trial court’s view on the matter remarked “The Trial Court has proceeded on the basis that the act of penetrative sexual in*******se by a person who is HIV positive is likely to cause death to the receptive partner. This is based on two assumptions. First, that such sexual in*******se is most likely to transmit the disease to the healthy partner; and second, that on the transmission of the disease, the partner so infected is likely to die. However, both the said assumptions, are without basis and without any scientific evidence, to support the same.” Since there was no disease transmitted to the victim and there was no mal-intent to kill the victim, the court scrapped the charges under section 307 IPC. The court also mentioned that section 270 IPC( malignant act to spread disease dangerous to life) was not applicable in the present case since there was no malice on the part of the accused regarding the spreading of the disease. The court, therefore, only upheld the conviction for r**e under section 376 of IPC and set aside conviction and sentencing under section 313 and 307 of IPC, and disposed of the appeal.

01/12/2019

ANTICIPATORY BAIL: 82 Important Supreme Court Cases with Head Notes & Citations(Posted by Advocate Pradeep kumar verma mathura (U.P.)

1. Kamlesh Singh @ Kamlesh Kumar Vs. State of U.P [04/11/2015]
Prevention Of Corruption - NHRM Scam - Anticipatory Bail - Uttar Pradesh

Citations : 2015 (12) Scale 651
2. Sudhir Vs. State Of Maharashtra [01/10/2015] Criminal Law - Prevention Of Corruption - Anticipatory Bail - Misappropriation Of Public Fund

Citations : 2015 AIR 3665 : 2015 (12) SCR 387 : 2016 (1) SCC 146 : 2015 (9) JT 120 : 2015 (10) Scale 280
3. Bhadresh Bipinbhai Sheth Vs. State Of Gujarat [01/09/2015] Criminal Law - R**e - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2015 AIR 3090 : 2015 (10) SCR 398 : 2016 (1) SCC 152 : 2015 (8) JT 125 : 2015 (9) Scale 403
4. Ashish Gopaldas Alias Gopikisan Lohia Vs. State Of Maharashtra [10/08/2015] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Grant

Citations : 2015 (7) JT 467 : 2015 (9) Scale 17
5. C. Chandrasekaraiah Vs. State Of Karnataka [13/04/2015] Prevention Of Corruption - Judgment of Acquittal - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2015 (13) SCC 802 : 2015 (4) JT 155 : 2015 (5) Scale 221
6. Teesta Atul Setalvad Vs. State Of Gujarat [19/03/2015] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Right

Citations : 2015 (14) SCC 584 : 2015 (3) JT 314 : 2015 (4) Scale 555
7. Mayank Pathak Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) [21/07/2014] Criminal Law - Cruelty - Anticipatory Bail - Medical Evidence

Citations : 2015 (11) SCC 798 : 2014 (8) Scale 624
8. Arnesh Kumar Vs. State Of Bihar [02/07/2014] Criminal Law - Cruelty - Dowry - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2014 AIR 2756 : 2014 (8) SCR 128 : 2014 (8) SCC 273 : 2014 (7) JT 527 : 2014 (8) Scale 250
9. Artatran Baliar Singh Vs. State of Orissa [01/07/2014] Criminal Law - Bail - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2014 (8) Scale 405

10. Gauri Shankar Poddar Vs. State Of Haryana [28/04/2014] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Entitlement

Citations : 2015 (3) SCC 770
11. Bachu Das Vs. State Of Bihar [03/02/2014] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Application - Maintainability

Citations : 2014 AIR 1317 : 2014 (2) SCR 287 : 2014 (3) SCC 471 : 2014 (2) Scale 41
12. Hema Mishra Vs. State Of U. P. And Ors. [16/01/2014] Constitutional Law - High Courts - Power - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2014 AIR 1066 : 2014 (1) SCR 465 : 2014 (4) SCC 453 : 2014 (2) JT 26 : 2014 (1) Scale 342
13. State Of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Pradeep Sharma [06/12/2013] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Cancellation - Absconder

Citations : 2014 AIR 626 : 2013 (12) SCR 772 : 2014 (2) SCC 171 : 2013 (15) JT 366 : 2013 (14) Scale 626
14. Sudam Charan Dash Vs. State Of Orissa [25/10/2013] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2014 AIR 536 : 2013 (10) SCR 284 : 2014 (2) SCC 141 : 2013 (14) JT 200 : 2013 (13) Scale 269
15. Sumit Mehta Vs. State Of N. C. T. Of Delhi [13/09/2013] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Amount - Deposit

Citations : 2013 (10) SCR 125 : 2013 (15) SCC 570 : 2013 (11) Scale 374
16. Nasiruddin Vs. State (Nct) Delhi [07/08/2013] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2013 (7) SCR 1085 : 2014 (13) SCC 579 : 2013 (10) Scale 141
17. Milan Krishna Roy Vs. State Of West Bengal [03/12/2012] Criminal Law - Medical Negligence - Anticipatory Bail - Doctor

Citations : 2013 (11) SCC 323
18. Padmakar Tukaram Bhavnagare Vs. State Of Maharashtra [26/11/2012] Criminal Law - Su***de - Anticipatory Bail - Grant

Citations : 2012 (13) SCC 720 : 2012 (11) JT 347 : 2012 (11) Scale 334
19. Vilas Pandurang Pawar Vs. State Of Maharashtra [10/09/2012] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Entitlement - Dismissal

Citations : 2012 AIR 3316 : 2012 (8) SCR 270 : 2012 (8) SCC 795 : 2012 (9) JT 390 : 2012 (8) Scale 577

20. Vilas Pandurang Pawar Vs. State Of Maharashtra [10/09/2012] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - SC/ST - Attrocities

Citations : 2012 AIR 3316 : 2012 (8) SCR 270 : 2012 (8) SCC 795 : 2012 (9) JT 390 : 2012 (8) Scale 577
21. Maruti Nivrutti Navale Vs. State Of Maharashtra [07/09/2012] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Grant - Refusal

Citations : 2012 (7) SCR 979 : 2012 (9) SCC 235 : 2012 (9) JT 285 : 2012 (8) Scale 572
22. Lavesh Vs. State (nct Of Delhi) [31/08/2012] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2012 (7) SCR 469 : 2012 (8) SCC 730 : 2012 (8) JT 336 : 2012 (8) Scale 303
23. Rashmi Rekha Thatoi Vs. State Of Orissa [04/05/2012] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2012 (5) SCR 674 : 2012 (5) SCC 690 : 2012 (4) JT 563 : 2012 (5) Scale 123
24. Emmanuel Eric Vs. State Of Haryana Thru. Secretary [27/04/2012] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Granted - Husband

Citations : 2012 (12) SCC 376
25. Tarakant Singh Vs. State Of Bihar [02/04/2012] Anticipatory Bail - Crime Against Women - Torture

Citations : 2012 (11) SCC 767
26. Shobhan Singh Khanka Vs. State Of Jharkhand [30/03/2012] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Grant

Citations : 2012 (2) SCR 663 : 2012 (4) SCC 684 : 2012 (3) JT 570 : 2012 (4) Scale 78
27. Ramdas Vasu Shetty Vs. State Of Maharashtra [16/03/2012] Criminal Law - Illegal Loan - Invalid Sale Deed - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2012 (4) SCC 511
28. Jai Prakash Singh Vs. State Of Bihar Etc. [14/03/2012] Criminal Law - Murder - Anticipatory Bail - Cancellation

Citations : 2012 AIR 1676 : 2012 (5) SCR 1 : 2012 (4) SCC 379 : 2012 (3) JT 501 : 2012 (3) Scale 484
29. Jarasindhu Choubey Vs. Amresh Chaubey @ Amresh Kumar Choubey [11/01/2012] Criminal Procedure - Murder - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2012 (12) SCC 455 : 2012 (1) Scale 320

30. Satish Vs. State Of Haryana [31/10/2011] Constitution Of India - Slp - R**e - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2012 (4) SCC 510
31. Dinbandhu Vs. State Of Bihar [23/09/2011] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Condition - Validity

Citations : 2011 (11) SCR 504 : 2011 (13) SCC 618 : 2011 (13) JT 231 : 2011 (12) Scale 1
32. Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. State Of Maharashtra and Others [02/12/2010] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Grant - Guidelines

Citations : 2011 AIR 312 : 2010 (15) SCR 201 : 2011 (1) SCC 694 : 2010 (13) JT 247 : 2010 (12) Scale 691
33. Pravinbhai Kashirambhai Patel Vs. State Of Gujarat [08/07/2010] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Cancellation - Grounds

Citations : 2010 AIR 3511 : 2010 (8) SCR 211 : 2010 (7) SCC 598 : 2010 (6) JT 656 : 2010 (6) Scale 537
34. Mukesh Kishanpuria Vs. State Of W. B. [03/05/2010] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2010 (5) SCR 702 : 2010 (15) SCC 154 : 2010 (5) JT 397 : 2010 (4) Scale 649
35. HDFC Bank Ltd. Vs. J. J. Mannan @ J. M. John Paul [16/12/2009] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Order - Extent

Citations : 2010 AIR 618 : 2009 (16) SCR 590 : 2010 (1) SCC 679 : 2009 (15) JT 484 : 2009 (14) Scale 724
36. Ravindra Saxena Vs. State Of Rajasthan [15/12/2009] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Grant - Salutary Principles

Citations : 2010 AIR 1225 : 2009 (16) SCR 433 : 2010 (1) SCC 684 : 2009 (15) JT 384 : 2009 (14) Scale 609
37. Hazari Lal Das Vs. State Of West Bengal [08/09/2009] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Cancellation - Grant

Citations : 2010 AIR 91 : 2009 (14) SCR 195 : 2009 (10) SCC 652 : 2009 (11) JT 651 : 2009 (12) Scale 307
38. Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Pvt. Ltd Vs. State Of Punjab [04/08/2009] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Grant

Citations : 2009 (12) SCR 326 : 2009 (9) SCC 414 : 2009 (12) JT 502 : 2009 (11) Scale 260
39. Savitri Agarwal Vs. State Of Maharashtra [10/07/2009] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Cancellation - Propriety

Citations : 2009 AIR 3173 : 2009 (10) SCR 978 : 2009 (8) SCC 325 : 2009 (9) JT 460 : 2009 (9) Scale 514

40. Sukhwant Singh Vs. State Of Punjab [18/05/2009] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Inherent Power - Courts

Citations : 2009 (7) SCC 559 : 2009 (12) JT 437 : 2009 (7) Scale 700
41. Parvinderjit Singh Vs. State (u. T. Chandigarh) [03/11/2008] Anticipatory Bail - Fraudulent Act - Embezzlement

Citations : 2009 AIR 502 : 2008 (15) SCR 155 : 2008 (13) SCC 431 : 2008 (11) JT 560 : 2008 (13) Scale 711
42. Union Of India Vs. Padam Narain Aggarwal Etc. [03/10/2008] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Power - Arrest

Citations : 2009 AIR 254 : 2008 (14) SCR 179 : 2008 (13) SCC 305 : 2008 (11) JT 6 : 2008 (13) Scale 171
43. Jonathan Nitin Brandy Vs. State Of West Bengal [10/09/2008] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Grant Of Bail - Appellant

Citations : 2008 AIR 584 : 2008 (8) SCC 660 : 2008 (12) Scale 301
44. Sureshchandra Ramanlal Vs. State Of Gujarat [15/05/2008] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Medical Ground - Gujarat

Citations : 2008 (7) SCC 591 : 2008 (7) JT 407 : 2008 (9) Scale 331
45. Som Mittal Vs. Govt. Of Karnataka [29/01/2008] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Inherent Powers Of High Court - Karnataka

Citations : 2008 AIR 1126 : 2008 (2) SCR 323 : 2008 (3) SCC 753 : 2008 (2) JT 41 : 2008 (2) Scale 108
46. State Of Punjab Vs. Raninder Singh [19/11/2007] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Contempt Of Court - Punjab & Haryana

Citations : 2008 AIR 609 : 2007 (12) SCR 307 : 2008 (1) SCC 564 : 2007 (13) JT 574 : 2007 (13) Scale 416
47. Naresh Kumar Yadav Vs. Ravindra Kumar And Ors [23/10/2007] Criminal Law - Criminal Proceedings - Anticipatory Bail - Patna

Citations : 2008 AIR 218 : 2007 (11) SCR 615 : 2008 (1) SCC 632 : 2007 (12) JT 171 : 2007 (12) Scale 531
48. State Of Maharashtra Vs. Mohd Sajid Husain Mohd S Husain Etc [10/10/2007] Criminal Law - Immoral Traffic - Anticipatory Bail - Bombay Mumbai

Citations : 2008 AIR 155 : 2007 (10) SCR 995 : 2008 (1) SCC 213 : 2007 (11) JT 587 : 2007 (12) Scale 63
49. State Of Gujarat Vs. Narendra K Amin [13/08/2007] Criminal Law - Murder - Anticipatory Bail - Regular Bail

Citations : 2007 AIR 2876 : 2007 (8) SCR 1009 : 2008 (13) SCC 594 : 2007 (10) JT 167 : 2007 (10) Scale 14

50. D K Ganesh Babu Vs. P.T. Manokaran [23/02/2007] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Dowry - Madras

Citations : 2007 AIR 1450 : 2007 (3) SCR 1 : 2007 (4) SCC 434 : 2007 (3) JT 572 : 2007 (3) Scale 445
51. Asi Jaswinder Singh Vs. State Of Punjab And Anr. [23/11/2006] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Departmental Proceedings - Punjab

Citations : 2007 (2) SCC 802
52. Sohan Lal Juneja Vs. State Of Punjab [09/11/2006] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Interim Protection - Condition

Citations : 2007 AIR 136 : 2006 (8) Suppl. SCR 770 : 2006 (12) SCC 433 : 2006 (12) Scale 210
53. Mahesh Chandra Vs. State Of Up And Others [01/05/2006] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Jurisdiction Of Court - U P

Citations : 2006 (6) SCC 196
54. M. P. Lohia Vs. State Of W. B. [04/02/2005] Criminal Law - Dowry Death - Anticipatory Bail.

Citations : 2005 AIR 790 : 2005 (2) SCC 686 : 2005 (2) JT 105 : 2005 (1) Scale 754
55. D. Prabhakaran Vs. Inspector Of Police, T. N. [05/01/2005] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Grant - Rejection

Citations : 2005 (12) SCC 399
56. U. O. I. Vs. Yusuf Razak Dhanani [09/09/2003] Criminal Law - Customs Act - Anticipatory Bail - Bombay Mumbai

Citations : 2003 AIR 4578 : 2003 ( 8) SCC 98 : 2003 ( 1) Suppl. JT 306 : 2003 ( 7) Scale 289
57. M. C. Abraham Vs. State Of Maharashtra [20/12/2002] Anticipatory Bail - Rejection - Arrest - Grounds

Citations : 2002 (5) Suppl. SCR 677 : 2003 (2) SCC 649 : 2002 (10) JT 482 : 2002 (9) Scale 769
58. Satish Sharma Vs. State Of Gujarat [05/12/2002] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Administration Of Justice - Interference

Citations : 2003 AIR 648 : 2002 (4) Suppl. SCR 635 : 2002 (10) SCC 323 : 2002 (10) JT 74 : 2002 (9) Scale 141
59. U. O. I. Vs. Vijay Kumar S/o Dharam Chand [12/11/2002] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2002 (10) JT 75 60. Amarjit Singh Vs. State Of Nct Of Delhi [08/01/2002] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Reasonable Cause - Trial Court

Citations : 2009 (13) SCC 769 : 2002 (1) JT 291
61. Narinderjit Singh Sahni Vs. U. O. I. [12/10/2001] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Criteria - Various Cases

Citations : 2001 AIR 3810 : 2001 ( 4) Suppl. SCR 114 : 2002 ( 2) SCC 210 : 2001 ( 8) JT 477 : 2001 ( 7) Scale 189
62. Muraleedharan Vs. State Of Kerala [18/04/2001] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Death - Liquor

Citations : 2001 AIR 1699 : 2001 ( 3) SCR 57 : 2001 ( 4) SCC 638 : 2001 ( 5) JT 84 : 2001 ( 3) Scale 440
63. Sanjeev Nagpaul Vs. State Of Tamil Nadu [23/03/2001] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 2001 ( 1) Suppl. JT 580
64. Prahlad Singh Bhati Vs. N. C. T. Delhi [23/03/2001] Criminal Procedure - Bail - Anticipatory Bail - Murder

Citations : 2001 AIR 1444 : 2001 ( 2) SCR 684 : 2001 ( 4) SCC 280 : 2001 ( 4) JT 116 : 2001 ( 2) Scale 572
65. K.K. Jerath Vs. U. T. Chandigarh [27/03/1998] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Detention - Public Interest

Citations : 1998 AIR 1934 : 1998 ( 4) SCC 80 : 1998 ( 2) JT 658 : 1998 ( 2) Scale 471
66. Directorate Of Enforcement Vs. Ashok Kumar Jain [08/01/1998] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Fera - Grounds

Citations : 1998 AIR 631 : 1998 ( 1) SCR 57 : 1998 ( 2) SCC 105 : 1998 ( 1) JT 29 : 1998 ( 1) Scale 12

67. R. K. Krishna Kumar Vs. State Of Assam [03/12/1997]
Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Unlawful Activity - Tata Tea

Citations : 1998 AIR 530 : 1997 ( 6) Suppl. SCR 153 : 1998 ( 1) SCC 474 : 1997 ( 9) JT 709 : 1997 ( 7) Scale 442
68. Dukhishyam Benupani Asstt. Director Enforcement Directorate Vs. Arun Kumar Bajoria [28/11/1997] Criminal Law - Fera - Anticipatory Bail - High Courts

Citations : 1998 AIR 696 : 1997 ( 5) Suppl. SCR 566 : 1998 ( 1) SCC 52 : 1997 ( 9) JT 379 : 1997 ( 7) Scale 258
69. State Of Assam Vs. Brojen Gogoi Dr. [24/10/1997] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Tata Tea - Unlawful Activity

Citations : 1998 AIR 143 : 1998 ( 1) SCC 397 : 1998 ( 4) JT 391 : 1997 ( 6) Scale 550

70. State Of Assam Vs. R. K. Krishna Kumar [24/10/1997] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Tata Tea - Unlawful Activity

Citations : 1998 AIR 144 : 1997 ( 8) JT 650 : 1997 ( 6) Scale 551
71. State Of A. P. Vs. Bimal Krishna Kundu [03/10/1997] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Question Paper - Leakage

Citations : 1997 AIR 3589 : 1997 ( 4) Suppl. SCR 412 : 1997 ( 8) SCC 104 : 1997 ( 8) JT 382 : 1997 ( 6) Scale 347
72. State Of A. P. Vs. Bimal Krishna Kundu [03/10/1997] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Examination - Leakage

Citations : 1997 AIR 3589 : 1997 ( 4) Suppl. SCR 412 : 1997 ( 8) SCC 104 : 1997 ( 8) JT 382 : 1997 ( 6) Scale 347
73. State Of A. P. Vs. Bimal Krishna Kundu [03/10/1997] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Validity - Non Bailable Offences

Citations : 1997 AIR 3589 : 1997 ( 4) Suppl. SCR 412 : 1997 ( 8) SCC 104 : 1997 ( 8) JT 382 : 1997 ( 6) Scale 347
74. State Of A. P. Vs. Bimal Krishna Kundu [03/10/1997] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Non Bailable Offences - Capital Punishment

Citations : 1997 AIR 3589 : 1997 ( 4) Suppl. SCR 412 : 1997 ( 8) SCC 104 : 1997 ( 8) JT 382 : 1997 ( 6) Scale 347
75. State Rep. By The C. B. I. Vs. Anil Sharma [03/09/1997] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 1997 AIR 3806 : 1997 ( 3) Suppl. SCR 737 : 1997 ( 7) SCC 187 : 1997 ( 7) JT 651 : 1997 ( 5) Scale 689
76. Director Of Enforcement Vs. P. V. Prabhakar Rao [05/08/1997] Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Urea Scam - Fera

Citations : 1997 AIR 3868 : 1997 ( 3) Suppl. SCR 247 : 1997 ( 6) SCC 647 : 1997 ( 7) JT 212 : 1997 ( 5) Scale 332
77. Central Bureau Of Investigation Vs. Chandraswami @ Nemi Chand Jain [26/02/1997] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Notice - High Courts

Citations : 1997 ( 2) SCR 513 : 1997 ( 3) SCC 214 : 1997 ( 3) JT 343 : 1997 ( 2) Scale 359
78. K. L. Verma Vs. State [13/10/1996] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Stay - Proceedings

Citations : 1998 (9) SCC 348 : 1998 (8) JT 521 : 1996 (7) Scale Sp 20
79. K. L. Verma Vs. State [13/10/1996]

Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Period - Bail

Citations : 1998 (9) SCC 348 : 1998 (8) JT 521 : 1996 (7) Scale Sp 20

80. State of M. P. Vs. Ram Kishna Balothia [06/02/1995]

Prevention Of Atrocity - SC/ST - Anticipatory Bail

Citations : 1995 AIR 1198 : 1995 ( 1) SCR 897 : 1995 ( 3) SCC 221 : 1995 ( 2) JT 310 : 1995 ( 1) Scale 658
81. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Vs. State Of Punjab [09/04/1980] Criminal Law - Anticipatory Bail - Interpretation Of Statutes - External Aid

Citations : 1980 AIR 1632 : 1980 (3) SCR 383 : 1980 (2) SCC 565
82. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Vs. State Of Punjab [09/04/1980] Judicial Process - Discretionary Jurisdiction - Anticipatory Bail - Practice & Procedure

Citations : 1980 AIR 1632 : 1980 (3) SCR 383 : 1980 (2) SCC

Address

R. No-201, K. M. Towers, Binny Compound 2nd Street, Kumaran Road
Tirupur
641601PH-8807330180,9524229197

Telephone

+914214229503

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when DT LEGAL FIRM posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to DT LEGAL FIRM:

Shortcuts

Share

Category