Jmk Real estate consultants

Jmk Real estate consultants Company is staffed with registered valuers, physical planners, and land surveyors.
(1)

JMK Real Estate Consultants is a licensed firm operating in Malawi, specializing in real estate services, property valuation, land surveying, and property Law expertise.

FOR SALE – Prime Property in Domasi, Zomba (Near Domasi College)A great investment opportunity in Domasi, Zomba, ideally...
10/07/2026

FOR SALE – Prime Property in Domasi, Zomba (Near Domasi College)

A great investment opportunity in Domasi, Zomba, ideally located near Domasi College. The property is suitable for both residential use and commercial development, particularly as a student hostel.
Property Features:
4-bedroom house (approximately 70% complete)
Kitchen
Dining room
Stores
Common toilet and bathroom
Master bedroom ensuite
Water connected and available from the Water Board

Land Size:
45m × 65m (0.2925 hectares)

Asking Price:
MK35 million (Negotiable)

For more information or to arrange a viewing: 📞 Call or WhatsApp: 0881 385 167

QUESTION NO. 70What does the concept of a real covenant entail under Malawian law?Answer:Under Malawian property law, a ...
25/06/2026

QUESTION NO. 70
What does the concept of a real covenant entail under Malawian law?

Answer:
Under Malawian property law, a real covenant is a covenant relating to land which binds not only the original parties to the agreement but also their successors in title.

The concept is recognised under the Registered Land Act.
Under Section 65, registration of land confers upon the proprietor absolute ownership together with all rights and privileges appurtenant thereto, subject to encumbrances noted on the register.

Further, Sections 68 and 69 provide that registered land may be subject to encumbrances such as restrictive covenants, and once such interests are properly registered, they bind subsequent proprietors of the land.

A real covenant therefore entails:
A promise or obligation relating to the use, development, or enjoyment of land;
A covenant that “touches and concerns” the land itself;
An obligation or restriction capable of binding successors in title when properly registered.

In essence, a real covenant runs with the land rather than remaining merely a personal obligation between the original contracting parties.

Scenario...
Suppose Mr. Banda sells a residential plot in Area 43, Lilongwe, to Ms. Phiri. In the sale agreement and on the land register, a covenant is entered stating that:

“No commercial or industrial activities shall be conducted on the property, and only a single residential dwelling may be erected on the land.”

Later, Ms. Phiri sells the property to Mr. Tembo. Even though Mr. Tembo was not an original party to the agreement between Mr. Banda and Ms. Phiri, he is still bound by the covenant because it was registered against the title and relates directly to the use and enjoyment of the land.

If Mr. Tembo attempts to construct shops or operate a warehouse on the property, neighbouring landowners or interested parties may seek legal remedies, including an injunction to restrain the breach.

In summary
The rationale behind real covenants is to preserve the character, value, and orderly use of land over time. Unlike ordinary contractual promises, which bind only the original parties, real covenants attach to the land itself. Therefore, anyone who later acquires the land takes it subject to the covenant, provided it was properly created and registered.

This principle is particularly important in:
residential estates,
subdivisions,
commercial parks,
and planned developments,

where uniform land use restrictions are necessary to protect the interests of all landowners within the area.

Accordingly, the essence of a real covenant under Malawian law is continuity: the rights and obligations endure beyond changes in ownership because they are connected to the land itself.

Question no. 69Do adopted children inherit equally? Answer...Yes, adopted children inherit equally under Malawian law.‌L...
23/06/2026

Question no. 69
Do adopted children inherit equally?

Answer...
Yes, adopted children inherit equally under Malawian law.
‌Legal Position in Malawi
Under the Adoption Act (Malawi) and the Deceased Estates (Wills, Inheritance and Protection) Act, an adopted child is treated as a biological (natural) child for purposes of inheritance.
‌Key Legal Principles (with brief section guidance)
Adoption Act
Once an adoption order is granted, the child is legally deemed the child of the adoptive parents “for all purposes”.
👉This includes rights of succession and inheritance.
(Commonly reflected under provisions dealing with effect of adoption orders).
Deceased Estates Act
Defines “child” to include adopted children.
👉 Adopted children are entitled to inherit equally with biological children, whether:
The deceased died with a will (testate), or
Without a will (intestate).
(See sections on dependants and distribution of estate).

Practical Effect
An adopted child:
Has full inheritance rights from adoptive parents.
Is treated exactly the same as any other child.
Cannot be discriminated against in estate distribution.

At the same time:
Legal ties with the biological parents are generally severed (unless otherwise specified), meaning inheritance typically follows the adoptive family line.

Question no. 68How can executing and signing a property document without retaining a copy jeopardize ownership rights an...
04/06/2026

Question no. 68
How can executing and signing a property document without retaining a copy jeopardize ownership rights and expose a party to significant legal and financial risk in a real estate transaction?

Scenario...
Audrey Banda agrees to purchase a plot of land in Area 49, Lilongwe, from Nathan Phiri. They execute a written agreement for sale, and Audrey signs the document in good faith. However, after signing, Audrey leaves without retaining a copy of the agreement. Months later, Nathan denies key terms of the transaction and proceeds to resell the same land to another buyer, Chifundo Mvula, who presents a signed agreement and supporting documents.

Answer...
Executing and signing a property document without retaining a copy creates serious evidentiary and proprietary risks under Malawian law, particularly in the following respects:

1. Proof of Contract and Terms
Under general principles of contract law, a party asserting rights under a contract must prove its existence and terms. Without a copy:
The burden of proof becomes difficult to discharge.
The party is exposed to disputes over purchase price, conditions, or even the existence of the agreement.
Although the Contracts Act does not require contracts for land to follow a strict format, evidentiary proof remains essential in enforcement.

2. Disposition of Land Must Be in Writing
Under Section 24 of the Registered Land Act:
Dispositions of an interest in land must be in writing and signed by the parties.
Failure to retain a copy undermines the ability to prove compliance with this statutory requirement, especially where the other party disputes the transaction.

3. Doctrine of Indefeasibility and Registration
Under Section 33 of the Registered Land Act:
Registration confers absolute ownership, subject only to noted encumbrances.
If the seller fraudulently transfers the land to a third party who becomes registered proprietor, that third party may acquire indefeasible title, particularly if they are a bona fide purchaser for value without notice. Without documentary proof, the original buyer (Chikondi) may fail to challenge such registration.

4. Risk of Fraud and Double Sale
The absence of a retained copy facilitates:
Fraudulent denial of the transaction
Multiple sales of the same property
Under Section 336 of the Penal Code, obtaining property by false pretences is a criminal offence, but criminal remedies do not automatically restore proprietary rights.

5. Limitation in Seeking Equitable Remedies
Equitable doctrines such as specific performance or constructive trust require clear and convincing evidence of the agreement. Without documentation:
Courts may decline relief due to insufficient proof
The claimant’s position is significantly weakened

Conclusion
Failing to retain a copy of a signed property document in Malawi can:
Undermine proof of contractual rights
Expose the transaction to fraud or denial
Jeopardize registration and ownership claims
Limit access to both legal and equitable remedies
In real estate transactions, documentation is not merely procedural—it is foundational to the protection and enforcement of proprietary interests.

Question no. 67Is a tenant entitled to a refund of rent after voluntarily giving up possession of leased premises withou...
04/06/2026

Question no. 67

Is a tenant entitled to a refund of rent after voluntarily giving up possession of leased premises without the landlord’s consent?

Scenario
Chikondi rented a house from Mr. Banda in Area 49, Lilongwe, and paid six months’ rent in advance. After staying for only two months, Chikondi decided to relocate for a new job in Blantyre. Without notifying or obtaining consent from Mr. Banda, he vacated the house and later demanded a refund for the remaining four months’ rent. Mr. Banda refused.

Answer...
Under Malawian law, a lease is a binding contract, and rent paid is generally not refundable unless there is an agreement to the contrary. Where a tenant unilaterally surrenders possession, this amounts to a repudiation of the lease agreement. The landlord is not obliged to accept the surrender or refund rent already paid.
According to common law principles applicable in Malawi, and as supported by the Registered Land Act (Cap. 58:01) and general contractual principles, surrender of a lease requires mutual agreement between landlord and tenant. In the absence of such agreement, the tenant remains liable for rent for the lease period.
Further, under Section 65 of the Registered Land Act, a lease can only be terminated in accordance with its terms or by agreement. Therefore, unilateral vacation does not automatically entitle the tenant to a refund.

Conclusion:
Chikondi is not entitled to a refund of the unused rent because he surrendered possession without the landlord’s consent, unless the lease agreement specifically provides for such a refund.

Property for sale in NyambadweCall on 0881385167
02/06/2026

Property for sale in Nyambadwe
Call on 0881385167

Beautiful house for rent in Chigumula commercial Call on 0881385167
02/06/2026

Beautiful house for rent in Chigumula commercial
Call on 0881385167

FOR SALE – Prime Property in Domasi, Zomba (Near Domasi College)A great investment opportunity in Domasi, Zomba, ideally...
02/06/2026

FOR SALE – Prime Property in Domasi, Zomba (Near Domasi College)
A great investment opportunity in Domasi, Zomba, ideally located near Domasi College. The property is suitable for both residential use and commercial development, particularly as a student hostels
This property offers excellent potential for rental income due to its proximity to Domasi College and the growing demand for student accommodation in the area.
For more information or to arrange a viewing: 📞 Call or WhatsApp: 0881 385 167

28/05/2026

Question no. 66
Encroachment dispute
Scenario...
Chimwemwe and Thoko inherited adjoining plots from their grandfather. Chimwemwe, who lives abroad, approved construction of rental apartments on his land despite knowing the building would extend onto Thoko’s land. Thoko, who was aware of the encroachment, did not object during construction. After a dispute, Thoko now demands demolition of the encroaching structure. Can Thoko succeed in court?

Answer...
Under Malawian law, encroachment onto another person’s land is generally unlawful, and the affected landowner is entitled to remedies. According to the Registered Land Act, Section 24, a registered proprietor has absolute ownership together with all rights and privileges appurtenant thereto, including the right to exclusive possession. This means Thoko has a legal right to protect his land from encroachment.
However, the situation is affected by Thoko’s conduct. Under equitable principles recognized in Malawi (common law), the doctrine of acquiescence or estoppel may apply. Where a landowner knowingly allows another to build on their land without objection, they may be prevented (estopped) from later demanding demolition, especially if the developer relied on that silence.
Courts in such cases often rely on fairness. Instead of demolition, the court may grant:
Compensation (damages) for the portion of land used; or
An order for transfer or regularisation of the encroached portion.

Conclusion:
While Thoko has a legal right against encroachment, he may not succeed in obtaining demolition because he knowingly allowed the construction to proceed. The court is more likely to award compensation or another equitable remedy rather than demolition.

Question no. 66Encroachment dispute Scenario...Chimwemwe and Thoko inherited adjoining plots from their grandfather. Chi...
28/05/2026

Question no. 66

Encroachment dispute

Scenario...
Chimwemwe and Thoko inherited adjoining plots from their grandfather. Chimwemwe, who lives abroad, approved construction of rental apartments on his land despite knowing the building would extend onto Thoko’s land. Thoko, who was aware of the encroachment, did not object during construction. After a dispute, Thoko now demands demolition of the encroaching structure. Can Thoko succeed in court?

Answer...
Under Malawian law, encroachment onto another person’s land is generally unlawful, and the affected landowner is entitled to remedies. According to the Registered Land Act, Section 24, a registered proprietor has absolute ownership together with all rights and privileges appurtenant thereto, including the right to exclusive possession. This means Thoko has a legal right to protect his land from encroachment.
However, the situation is affected by Thoko’s conduct. Under equitable principles recognized in Malawi (common law), the doctrine of acquiescence or estoppel may apply. Where a landowner knowingly allows another to build on their land without objection, they may be prevented (estopped) from later demanding demolition, especially if the developer relied on that silence.
Courts in such cases often rely on fairness. Instead of demolition, the court may grant:
Compensation (damages) for the portion of land used; or
An order for transfer or regularisation of the encroached portion.

Conclusion:
While Thoko has a legal right against encroachment, he may not succeed in obtaining demolition because he knowingly allowed the construction to proceed. The court is more likely to award compensation or another equitable remedy rather than demolition.

Address

Off Chilembwe Road
Blantyre

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Jmk Real estate consultants posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Jmk Real estate consultants:

Shortcuts

Share