Empire Estates Davao

30/01/2026

Sa sesyon ng En Banc ngayong Miyerkules, ika-28 ng Enero 2026, nagpasya ang Korte Suprema na kapag lampas na sa dalawang taon mula sa administrative reconstitution o muling pagsasaayos ng titulo ng lupa, hindi na kailangan ang paglalathala sa ilalim ng R.A. 26.

Sa Desisyon na isinulat ni Associate Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez, tinanggihan ng Korte ang petisyon na inihain ng Republika ng Pilipinas, sa pamamagitan ng Office of the Solicitor General, na kumuwestiyon sa pagpapatanggal ng annotation sa titulo sa lupa ni Antonio V. Mitra.

Si Mitra ay may-ari ng isang lupain sa Quezon City. Nang ipalagay na nawala o nasira ang kanyang Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT), nagsumite siya ng kahilingan para sa administratibong reconstitution ng titulo.

Alinsunod sa Republic Act (R.A.) Blg. 26, ang batas na namamahala sa reconstitution ng mga titulong nawala o nasira, ang naibalik na titulo ay may anotasyong nagsasaad na ito ay walang paglabag o pagkasira sa karapatan o interes ng sinumang partido na nakatala sa orihinal na kopya noong ito ay nawala o nasira.

Pagkalipas ng dalawampu’t pitong taon, humiling si Mitra sa Regional Trial Court (RTC) na ipabura ang anotasyon, sa dahilang wala namang sinumang nag-angkin o nagpakita ng interes sa ari-arian sa loob ng panahong iyon. Pinagbigyan ng RTC ang kahilingan at iniutos ang pagtanggal ng anotasyon. Pinagtibay naman ito ng Court of Appeals, na nagpasya na hindi na kailangan ang publikasyon at pagpapaskil dahil sa mahabang panahong lumipas mula nang ma-reconstitute ang titulo.

Bilang pag-sang-ayon sa Court of Appeals, ipinaliwanag ng Korte Suprema na sa ilalim ng R.A. Blg. 26, kakailanganin lamang ang pagpapaskil at publikasyon kung ang petisyon para ipabura ang kinakailangang anotasyon ay inihain sa loob ng dalawang taon mula sa petsa ng administratibong reconstitution, at kung wala ring inihain na petisyon para maitala ang isang interes na maaaring nakaligtaan sa loob ng panahong iyon.

Basahin ang kabuuan ng Press Briefer sa https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=159902.

Ang buong teksto ng Desisyon sa G.R. No. 264862, Republic of the Philippines v. Antonio V. Mitra, ay ilalathala sa website ng Korte Suprema sa sandaling ito ay maging available.

Sumunod sa Credit Attribution Policy ng SC PIO: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution-policy/.

23/01/2026

23/01/2026

For Sale!!! 2,079 sqm commercial corner lot at 80k per sqm, negotiable. Very near SPMC and SSS Bajada. PM us for site viewing!

23/01/2026

Rush Sale!!! Dumoy land 6,680 sqm @ P4,000/sqm. Great for retreat or investment. Accessible, peaceful, affordable.

22/01/2026

For sale: Newly built income-generating dormitory in SM Village, Bangkal, Davao City — REPRICED at Php 30,000,000.00

*Lot area: 270 sqm
*16 fully furnished rooms
*Each room with air-conditioning, private toilet & bath with heater
*Currently leased to a BPO company (steady rental income)
*Very near Savemore Bangkal and Ateneo de Davao Senior High School campus
*Ideal for investors or owner-occupiers
Serious inquiries only. Contact: James @ 09171027885

19/01/2026

The (SC) has ruled that a land sale made through a verbal, unwritten agreement can be considered valid and binding—as long as it has been partly or fully carried out.

In a Decision written by Associate Justice Samuel H. Gaerlan, the SC’s Third Division upheld the verbal sale of land between Marcos Batara (Batara) and his nephew Benedicto Ocampo (Ocampo). Even without a written contract, the SC found the sale valid because Ocampo had already received the land title, moved into the property, and made improvements on it.

The land was registered in the name of Batara, who passed away in 1974. His children, Noblesa and Ernesto, only learned of their father’s ownership of the property in 2007, when they received a notice to pay unpaid real estate taxes on the land and found out that the same was being occupied by their cousin, Ocampo.

Noblesa and Ernesto filed a case to reclaim the land from Ocampo, saying they were the rightful heirs. Ocampo, on the other hand, claimed he bought the land from Batara while the latter was still alive. After Batara died, Ocampo kept paying installments to Marcelo, Batara’s brother.

Ocampo admitted that the sale was not evidenced by any written document because Batara died before they could execute the necessary instruments. But Ocampo provided the owner’s copy of land title as proof, claiming Batara gave it to him after the initial payment in 1972.

Ruling in Ocampo’s favor, the SC said that under the Civil Code, a sale of land must be in writing to be enforced in court. This written document serves as proof that both parties agreed to the sale.

However, the sale is still considered valid even without a written contract if it has already been fully or partly carried out. In such cases, a verbal agreement can still be legally binding, and witnesses may be allowed to testify to prove that the sale happened.

In this case, the sale was partially executed as Ocampo had partially paid for the land, taken possession of it, received the land title, and paid real property taxes. The SC thus admitted the testimonies of Ocampo and his witnesses, which proved the sale.

The SC, however, found that Ocampo’s payments to Batara’s brother Marcelo were ineffective because he was not authorized to accept them on behalf of his brother’s heirs.

Therefore, while the sale remains valid, Ocampo must pay the remaining balance of the purchase price, with interest, to Noblesa and Ernesto.

Read the full text of the Press Release at https://tinyurl.com/yeapyzcd.

Read the full text of the Decision at https://tinyurl.com/msxr7hsd.

Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution-policy/.

16/01/2026

Tagum Property - Property 06-0002

FOR SALE: 1,072 sqm commercial lot located in the heart of Tagum. This property has a frontage of 16 meters along a four-lane highway and is located just beside Gaisano Grand of Tagum. For interested prospect buyers, please call us at (082) 225-3601 and please indicate Property Index Number 2021-6002 for faster transaction.

This property is being offered for the price of Fifty Million Pesos (P50,000,000.00), net to the seller, a price which is reaonable considering its location and nearby establishments.

16/01/2026

Toril Property - Property 06-0001

FOR SALE: 1,000 sqm commercial lot located in the heart of Toril. Only P15,000 per square meter, net to the seller. For interested prospect buyers, please call us at (082) 225-3601 and please indicate Property Index Number 2021-6001 for faster transaction.

This property is being offered for the price of Fifteen Million Pesos (P15,000,000.00), net to the seller, a price which is significantly lower than all the other being offered in the area.

16/01/2026

15/01/2026

This page has just been recovered by the admins. Apologies to our dear clients who were not responded with their queries. We will endeavor to be more responsive and effective in addressing our clients’ concerns. God bless everyone.