What are the opening hours?

Monday 8am - 8pm Tuesday 8am - 8pm Wednesday 8am - 8pm Thursday 8am - 8pm Friday 8am - 8pm Saturday 8am - 8pm Sunday 8am - 8pm

https://www.facebook.com/406599832532749/

G.G. Wenceslao Real Estate Review Center, Unit S13, 2nd Floor, Robertson Plaza, Brgy. Tabon 1, Kawit (2026)

15/10/2026

Online Oathtaking of the New Real Estate Appraisers, Brokers and Salespersons

The Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) informs the new Real Estate
Appraisers, Brokers and Salespersons that the conduct of the online mass
oathtaking will be on October 21 and November 05, 2026, at 10:00 A.M., which will
be spearheaded by PRC-Pagadian via Zoom.

Inductees shall wear formal or business attire and use a white backdrop (white
physical or virtual background) throughout the oathtaking ceremony.

Please secure an online appointment schedule at https://online.prc.gov.ph/ and
select “e-OATH” as transaction. Inductees are required to print the "OATH OF PROFESSIONAL" form downloadable from the PRC official website under PRC Online Services.

Please check the link below for the step-by-step procedure of online oathtaking
application system: https://www.prc.gov.ph/article/online-oathtaking-application-
system/4532

For specific registration and ceremony protocols, kindly check this link:
https://www.prc.gov.ph/sites/default/files/2020-1255%20revised.pdf

(END)

06/10/2026

READ | September 2026 Inflation Report 📊

Headline or overall inflation in the Philippines increased to 7.2% in September 2026, from 6.1% in August 2026.

Key Highlights:
• January to September 2026 average inflation: 5.4%
• September 2025 inflation: 1.7%

🔎 Read the full report:
➡ https://psa.gov.ph/price-indices/cpi-ir/index

05/10/2026

𝐓𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐌𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐨𝐫, 𝐂𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡, 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐫, & 𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫

Happy Teacher’s Day to 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐥𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧!

Behind every successful real estate professional, licensed broker, and appraiser is a steadfast guide who turned complex laws, intimidating valuation math, and dense legal codes into moments of absolute clarity.

Thank you for your unmatched patience, your brilliant mentorship, and your boundless belief in our journey. You don’t just teach lessons for an exam; you shape minds, elevate the industry, and build legacies that last a lifetime.

Here’s to celebrating excellence, wisdom, and leadership today and every day! 🥂📚✨

-𝙂.𝙂. 𝙒𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙨𝙡𝙖𝙤 𝙍𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙀𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙍𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙚𝙬 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧

03/10/2026

SUPREME COURT NULLIFIES MARRIAGE OVER FALSE COHABITATION AFFIDAVIT

The Supreme Court (SC) has voided a couple’s marriage after finding that they falsely claimed to have lived together for five years to dispense with the requirement of a marriage license.

In a 15-page ruling written by Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul Inting, the SC’s Third Division denied the petition seeking to declare the couple’s marriage valid despite the absence of a marriage license.

The couple had lived together as husband and wife since December 2003. In 2006, the husband left for Israel to work and returned in 2009 to marry his wife.

To facilitate their marriage without the required license, the couple executed an Affidavit of Cohabitation, claiming they had lived together for six years and were thus exempt from the marriage license requirement under the Family Code.

The husband, in 2013, filed a petition to declare the marriage void, arguing that the affidavit they executed was false because he was in Israel for most of the period it covered.

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) granted the petition, finding that the couple had not actually lived together continuously for five years before the marriage.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC, holding that the husband’s absence from 2006 to 2009 interrupted the required period of cohabitation. It also held that the affidavit could not substitute for a marriage license.

The Office of the Solicitor General filed a petition before the Supreme Court, arguing that cohabitation does not require constant physical presence and that the husband’s work in Israel did not end the relationship, as he returned to the Philippines for the wedding.

It also argued that he could not claim the affidavit was false after voluntarily executing it and using it to obtain a marriage license exemption.

In rejecting the contention of the SolGen, the SC said that under Article 3(2) of the Family Code, one of the formal requisites of a marriage is a valid marriage license.

It also explained that Article 34 provides an exception for couples who have lived together as husband and wife for at least five years and have no legal impediment to marry each other. The couple must state these facts in an affidavit, while the solemnizing officer must execute a sworn statement attesting that no legal restriction exists.

The SC reiterated that the five-year cohabitation period is counted back from the marriage date. The couple must have lived together continuously and exclusively, without interruption or a third party.

The high bench, citing Niñal v. Bayadog, reiterated that the five-year cohabitation period is counted back from the marriage date. The couple must have lived together continuously and exclusively, without interruption or a third party.

It clarified that temporary absence does not interrupt cohabitation if the couple otherwise continued living as husband and wife, for example, by sharing a home and expenses or publicly presenting themselves as a couple.

The high court found the couple failed to meet the five-year requirement, saying they lived separately and only occasionally shared a rented room with relatives from 2001 to 2004.

From 2005 to 2009, while the husband was in Israel, there was no evidence that they presented themselves as spouses or that he intended to return to the Philippines to live with his wife.

The SC also found that the husband’s testimony showed the couple had not lived together continuously for five years, making their affidavit to the solemnizing officer false. His testimony also supported the finding that they failed to meet the five-year requirement.

02/10/2026

𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬, 𝐇𝐨𝐧. 𝐉𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐞 𝐁. 𝐃𝐨𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐫𝐨! 🎉

From all of us at G.G. Wenceslao Real Estate Review Center (GGWRERC), we are immensely proud to congratulate BLGF V Regional Director Jessie B. Doctolero on his official re-appointment and oath-taking as a Member of the Professional Regulatory Board of Real Estate Service (PRB-RES)!

Having a dedicated pillar like RD Doctolero—whose leadership seamlessly bridges local fiscal governance with national regulatory excellence—is a true blessing for the entire real estate sector. Your continued dedication to upholding the highest standards for government appraisers and practitioners under RESA inspires everyone in the industry.

We wish you a successful, impactful, and inspiring term ahead as you continue to serve our nation and uplift the real estate profession! 🌟

02/10/2026

Important Reminders on Examination Policies and Allowable Items
The Professional Regulation Commission (PRC/Commission) reminds all examinees to strictly observe the following policies to ensure orderly, secure, and uniform conduct of licensure examinations:
1. Transparent Plastic Envelope as the Default Allowable Container
• Examinees may bring ONLY ONE (1) transparent plastic envelope, with or without a handle, for examination-related documents and materials.
• Maximum size: fifteen (15) inches in length, ten (10) inches in width, and one and a half (1.5) inches in expanded depth.
• This shall be the primary and default container for allowable belongings.
2. Water and Food Containers
• Water must be in a transparent, single-use plastic bottle free from labels, markings, stickers, or any other material that may contain or convey written information.
• Colored tumblers may be allowed, subject to inspection.
• A transparent open-top hand-carry bag or tote bag may be allowed for food, drinks, and essential personal items that cannot reasonably fit inside the prescribed transparent plastic envelope, subject to inspection.
• The tote bag must not have a zipper, snap button, magnetic closure, drawstring, or other means of closing or securing the bag.
3. Strictly Prohibited Items
The following are NOT ALLOWED inside the examination venue:
• Books, codes, written materials, and other examination aides, cellphones, smartwatches, tablets, smart glasses, wireless earbuds, and other smart gadgets or electronic devices capable of capturing, storing, accessing, receiving, transmitting, or communicating information are strictly prohibited inside the examination venue.
• Bags of any kind, including transparent backpacks, duffel bags, eco-bags, plastic shopping bags, and other similar containers, shall not be allowed inside the examination venue, except the specifically allowed transparent open-top hand-carry bag or tote bag, subject to inspection.
IMPORTANT REMINDER:
To avoid inconvenience, delays, or possible examination-related violations, examinees are strongly advised to bring ONLY the items expressly allowed under the examination guidelines.
For queries and concerns, examinees may contact the Licensure Office at [email protected] or [email protected], or the concerned PRC Regional Office through this link: https://prc.gov.ph/regional-offices-contact-information
For other official updates and announcements on the licensure examinations, please visit the PRC website at https://prc.gov.ph/ and follow the PRC official page at https://www.facebook.com/professionalregulationcommission
(END)

01/10/2026

🚨 𝙔𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙟𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙣𝙚𝙮 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖 𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙗𝙧𝙤𝙠𝙚𝙧 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙨 𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚! 🚨

Registration is open for our 2027 Real Estate Broker Licensure Exam Review! We've designed a program to give you the best chance to succeed.

𝘏𝘦𝘳𝘦'𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵:
𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐒𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬: 20 interactive classes via Zoom.
𝐏𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭: Daily quizzes, long exams, and a final mock exam.
𝐅𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠: Get all presentations, handouts, and recordings of every session.
𝐁𝐨𝐧𝐮𝐬 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭: Optional final coaching sessions to fine-tune your knowledge.

𝘛𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦:
𝐎𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟏, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓: We'll send out your advance review materials.
𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟐, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓: Get ready for daily quizzes.
𝐉𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐲 - 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 (Tentative): Join our Zoom classes every Friday and Saturday from 6 PM - 9 PM.

𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐁𝐢𝐫𝐝 𝐑𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐏𝐇𝐏 𝟗,𝟗𝟗𝟗 -until October 31, 2026 only!
(regular rate is PHP 12,000)

𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸: https://forms.gle/NugWEbWyFgh3RNz36

30/09/2026

The has ruled that waiving rights to inherited property may be considered a valid donation when it shows intent to donate and meets the legal requirements for a donation.

In a Decision written by Associate Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez, the SC’s Second Division denied the consolidated petitions filed by Felix G. Cruz and affirmed the Court of Appeals’ (CA) rulings upholding the transfer of two inherited properties by Luis and Rosita Cruz to their sons, Robin and Osias.

The case involved two parcels of land left by Judy Cruz, who died single and without a will. She was survived by her parents, Luis and Rosita, and five siblings, including Felix, Robin, and Osias.

After Judy’s death, Luis and Rosita executed separate notarized 𝘞𝘢𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘙𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 over the properties in favor of Robin and Osias, who later executed an 𝘌𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘫𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘚𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘌𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 and registered the properties in their names.

Felix and his two other siblings, Doris and Henry, also executed waivers giving up any interest in the properties. Felix, who was the family lawyer, prepared these documents.

After their mother died, Felix sought to nullify the transfer of the properties and cancel the titles of Robin and Osias. Felix argued that the transfer was invalid and that the properties should have remained part of their mother’s estate, to which he was entitled to inherit as one of the heirs.

The SC upheld the ruling of the trial court and the CA dismissing Felix’s complaint and holding that the Waivers of Rights executed by Luis and Rosita constituted valid donations in favor of Robin and Osias.

The SC explained that when Judy died, ownership of her properties immediately passed to her parents as her legal heirs. Luis and Rosita therefore had the right to dispose of the properties.

Although the documents they executed were called 𝘞𝘢𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘙𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴, the SC found that Luis and Rosita intended to donate the properties to Robin and Osias.

Under Article 749 of the 𝘊𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭 𝘊𝘰𝘥𝘦, a valid donation of real property requires: (1) a decrease in the donor’s property; (2) a corresponding increase in the donee’s property; (3) intent to donate; (4) ex*****on of the donation in a public document; and (5) acceptance by the donee. If the acceptance is in a separate document, the donor must be informed.

These requirements were met in this case. Luis and Rosita gave up their ownership of the properties in favor of Robin and Osias through notarized documents that expressly authorized the transfer. Robin and Osias, in turn, accepted the donation by executing the 𝘌𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘫𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘚𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 and registering the properties in their names. Their actions were made known to Luis and Rosita.

Read the full text of the Press Release at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=174097.

Read the full text of the Decision at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=168026.

Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution-policy/.

29/09/2026

𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲?
Passing the board exam isn’t just about working hard—it’s about preparing smart. With the 𝐆𝐆𝐖𝐑𝐄𝐑𝐂 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟕 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐄𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐤𝐞𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦, you won't just be memorizing terms; you'll be building the confidence and competence needed to ace the exam on your first try.

Why focus on concepts and techniques?
✔ 𝙐𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙, 𝘿𝙤𝙣'𝙩 𝙅𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙈𝙚𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙯𝙚: We break down complex legal provisions, code requirements, and ethical standards so you can easily analyze any situational question.
✔ 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙏𝙚𝙨𝙩-𝙏𝙖𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙎𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙚𝙨: Learn expert elimination techniques and how to dissect tricky board questions under time pressure.
✔ 𝙈𝙤𝙘𝙠 𝙀𝙭𝙖𝙢𝙨 & 𝘽𝙤𝙖𝙧𝙙-𝙎𝙩𝙮𝙡𝙚 𝙌𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨: Get familiar with the actual pacing and structure of the exam so there are no surprises on test day.
✔ 𝘼 𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙁𝙪𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝘽𝙧𝙤𝙠𝙚𝙧𝙨: Learn alongside driven peers who share your goals and keep you motivated.
✔ 360° 𝘽𝙧𝙤𝙠𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙜𝙚 𝘾𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙜𝙚: Master the entire scope of brokerage practice—including marketing, agency relationships, documentation, local taxation, zoning, and legal compliance.

Don't leave your license to chance. Equip yourself with the right strategy, the right tools, deep conceptual mastery.

𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐒𝐩𝐨𝐭 𝐓𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲: https://forms.gle/NugWEbWyFgh3RNz36

19/09/2026

An absolute honor to meet the man who literally wrote the law for Philippine real estate—the “Father of the Real Estate Service Act (RESA),” Mr. Rodolfo "RGV" Valencia! ✨

Thank you for your time and for paving the way for the next generation of real estate professionals! 🙌

G.G. Wenceslao Real Estate Review Center

15/10/2026

06/10/2026

05/10/2026

03/10/2026

02/10/2026

02/10/2026

01/10/2026

30/09/2026

29/09/2026

19/09/2026

Address

Opening Hours

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request

Monday	8am - 8pm
Tuesday	8am - 8pm
Wednesday	8am - 8pm
Thursday	8am - 8pm
Friday	8am - 8pm
Saturday	8am - 8pm
Sunday	8am - 8pm