G & S Group KW Commercial

G & S Group KW Commercial We assist buyers, sellers, landlords and tenants with the sale and lease of commercial real estate.

Just Sold - Just closed escrow on 2 parcels in Apple Valley. The property consisted of Four 5,642 SF buildings on 2 comb...
08/18/2026

Just Sold - Just closed escrow on 2 parcels in Apple Valley. The property consisted of Four 5,642 SF buildings on 2 combined lots totaling +/-40,000 SF on fenced lots. The Buyers acquired the property utilizing SBA financing with 10% down. Who do you know looking to sell commercial property in Southern California? Lets connect. Patrick Sharples CA. Lic # 01245463

🚨 CALL FOR OFFERS — LOS ANGELES LAND FOR SALE 🚨G & S Group | KW Commercial is pleased to present 1313–1337 W. 11th Place...
07/17/2026

🚨 CALL FOR OFFERS — LOS ANGELES LAND FOR SALE 🚨

G & S Group | KW Commercial is pleased to present 1313–1337 W. 11th Place, Los Angeles, a six-parcel land assemblage totaling approximately 68,707 square feet, or 1.57 acres.

The property is paved, fenced, and currently configured for surface parking, offering several potential investment strategies:

âś… Continue operating public or event parking
âś… Explore an EV-charging or fleet-charging facility
âś… Hold the property for future appreciation
âś… Evaluate commercial, mixed-use, or housing redevelopment opportunities

The offering consists of two sites located across W. 11th Place, with corner locations and frontage along multiple streets.

The property also offers convenient access to the 110 and 10 freeways and is located near:

📍 Crypto.com Arena
📍 L.A. LIVE
📍 Los Angeles Convention Center
📍 Downtown Los Angeles

This opportunity may be ideal for developers, investors, parking operators, EV-infrastructure companies, and land buyers seeking a substantial infill property near Downtown Los Angeles.

All proposed uses and development plans are subject to buyer verification, zoning, permitting, utility capacity, and governmental approvals.

đź“© Contact Patrick Sharples for pricing, parcel information, offering materials, or to arrange a property tour.

Patrick Sharples
G&S Group | KW Commercial

Please share this post with anyone who may have an interest in this Los Angeles development and parking opportunity.
Subject to Bankruptcy Court approval

05/27/2026
Currently entertaining offers on this +/-125,456 SF retail center on approximately 10.023 acres of flat, usable land in ...
05/27/2026

Currently entertaining offers on this +/-125,456 SF retail center on approximately 10.023 acres of flat, usable land in Fullerton, CA. Best suited for a residential or mixed use redevelopment. NNN Lease drive thru's include Starbucks, Carl's, Jr., El Pollo Loco, and Molcasalsa. Contact Patrick Sharples or Christine Sung for more info. Call/text Patrick at 714-293-2792 CA Lic # 01245463

04/21/2026

New Article from CoStar regarding retail lease rates:

Retail rents grow at slowest pace since 2014
Midwestern markets outperform as Sun Belt gains ease
A Publix grocery store in Orlando, Florida, an area where retail rents increased by an average of 5.1% over the past year. (CoStar)
A Publix grocery store in Orlando, Florida, an area where retail rents increased by an average of 5.1% over the past year. (CoStar)
By Brandon Svec
CoStar Analytics
April 20, 2026 | 4:35 P.M.

RELATED ARTICLES
Multifamily rent growth grinds to a halt in LA
Midlands big-box market reaches turning point as supply starts to fall
Sticky concessions continue to weigh on Dallas-Fort Worth multifamily market
Houston leads Texas hotel sales surge
Trenton top-tier apartment segment sports a 43% discount to paying for a house
Retail rents grew at their slowest pace in the first quarter since 2014, reflecting a market gradually returning to equilibrium after several years of outsized gains.

At the national level, asking rents for retail space increased by a modest 1.9% over the past year, extending a moderating trend that began in 2023 as the pace of rent growth continued to cool. This is the first time year-over-year growth fell below 2.0% since the first quarter of 2014, when it was just 1.8% as the market was still recovering from the Great Recession.

While supply and demand fundamentals in the retail sector remain balanced, a slight uptick in vacancy, alongside moderating tenant sales growth, has reduced landlords’ ability to push rents at the aggressive pace seen immediately after the pandemic.

This deceleration is less a sign of weakening demand than a function of normalization. Retail sales surged in the years following the pandemic, driven by fiscal stimulus, stronger household balance sheets, and a rapid rebound in store traffic.

Rent increases followed, but with a lag. As sales growth has leveled out across most retail segments, occupancy costs have risen back to, and in some cases above, pre‑pandemic levels.

With rent‑to‑sales ratios now more closely aligned with historical averages, operating costs and interest rates remaining elevated, and uncertainty rising, retail tenants have become more resistant to additional rent pressure, particularly in discretionary categories. As a result, the pace of rent increases has moderated even as retail leasing activity and occupancy remain relatively strong.

Regional variance
That deceleration is evident across most major markets, though performance continues to vary by region. Several Sun Belt markets that led the nation in retail rent growth earlier in the cycle, including Phoenix, Orlando, Florida, Atlanta and Charlotte, North Carolina, still posted solid year‑over‑year gains at the end of the first quarter, but growth rates have clearly slowed as asking rents reset to higher plateaus.

Coastal U.S. markets, including Los Angeles and San Francisco, recorded flat to modestly negative rent growth over the past year, reflecting both existing higher rent levels and a more pronounced pullback in discretionary spending.

In contrast, Midwestern markets are showing renewed momentum. Minneapolis posted the strongest year‑over‑year gain in retail rent increases at 6.9%, outperforming many faster‑growing Sun Belt peers. Columbus, Ohio, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, Kansas City, Missouri, and St. Louis, Missouri, also ranked among the better‑performing markets.

This retail rent momentum across Midwestern markets reflects a delayed reaction to the post‑pandemic surge in consumer spending, as many markets in the Midwest were slower to experience rent increases on the back of the rapid increase in sales growth.

At the same time, a growing number of markets posted retail rent declines over the past year. In addition to high‑cost coastal metropolitan areas, several markets, including Pittsburgh, Detroit, Sacramento, California, and Philadelphia, recorded modest contractions in average retail rents.

Taken together, first‑quarter data suggest retail rents are entering a more sustainable phase of growth. The rapid run‑up in rents that followed the post‑pandemic sales surge has largely played out, bringing occupancy costs back in line with long‑term averages.

While rent growth is unlikely to reaccelerate meaningfully in the near term, limited new supply and consistently strong tenant demand should provide a floor under retail rents, particularly in markets where pricing lagged earlier.

In addition, thanks to the outsized growth seen earlier this decade, retail landlords are still experiencing near multi-decade-high rent spreads when spaces leased under five- and 10-year leases roll over.

Who do you know looking to sell, buy or lease commercial real estate in southern California? We can help! 714-293-2792 CA Lic # 01245463

Reminder - 2nd portion of property taxes are Due no later than April 10th. For Orange County properties - taxbill.octrea...
04/03/2026

Reminder - 2nd portion of property taxes are Due no later than April 10th.
For Orange County properties - taxbill.octreasurer.gov
For Los Angeles County properties - https://www.propertytax.lacounty.gov/

Assessor, Auditor-Controller, Treasurer and Tax Collector, and Assessment Appeals Board have prepared this property tax information site to provide taxpayers with an overview and some specific detail about the property tax process in Los Angeles County.

The Los Angeles Board of Supervisors is at it again......see below and take action - especially if you own property in L...
02/06/2026

The Los Angeles Board of Supervisors is at it again......see below and take action - especially if you own property in Los Angeles County or Los Angeles County (unincorporated areas).

Red Alert:
TUESDAY: L.A. County Considers Countywide Eviction Restriction

By Janet M. Gagnon
Chief Corporate Affairs Officer & SVP Government Affairs

On February 10th, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors will vote on a motion by Supervisors Lindsey Horvath instructing the County Counsel to draft a resolution creating a COUNTYWIDE monetary eviction threshold equal to THREE (3) month’s Fair Market Rent (FMR) (as determined by the U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Department). This new restriction would prevent property owners from initiating an eviction proceeding until this new threshold has been met (Agenda Item 20).

The proposed motion is being raised by Supervisor Horvath under the guise of an “emergency” based on recent immigration enforcement activities. Supervisor Horvath’s motion applies to ALL 88 incorporated cities in addition to all unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County and ALL rental housing, including multifamily, single-family, condominiums, townhouses and accessory dwelling units (ADUs). We urge all rental housing providers with rentals in Los Angeles County to attend the Board of Directors meeting on Tuesday in-person, via Zoom or by telephone as we need a strong showing of property owners in opposition to this motion. Please ask your employees and networking group to attend or call into the meeting as well. Also, please immediately email all 5 Supervisors urging them to reject this horrific motion.

REASONS TO OPPOSE
This motion would create a serious legal conflict under the County’s existing Rent Stabilization and Tenant Protections Ordinance (RSTPO) tenant anti-harassment provision, which prevents owners from asking a renter regarding their “residence or citizenship status”. As it would apply countywide, it would also conflict with multiple city tenant anti-harassment ordinances, including the City of Los Angeles, Claremont, Cudahy, Culver City, Long Beach, Maywood, Pasadena and others. Passage of the motion would cause rental housing providers to either violate existing tenant anti-harassment restrictions or wrongfully file an eviction against a renter impacted by federal immigration activities.

Creating a countywide monetary eviction threshold will only allow renters to fall further behind in rent causing more damage to their credit scores and ability to obtain new housing.

This added delay before housing providers may use the ONLY leverage available to them to seek payment of rent or to recover a rental unit will result in many more months of lost income and cause severe financial harm, particularly to already struggling housing providers. Current evictions in California already can take up to six months plus an addition three to six months before obtaining a sheriff’s lockout – this proposal will merely add months to an already long and delayed process to collect legally owned rent. In particular, “mom-and-pop” owners who provide some of the most affordable rental housing would be most impacted and may possibly be forced out of business entirely.

For example, a single non-paying renter for a 10-plex equates to a loss of 10% of total income, but the same non-paying renter living in a 4-plex equals equates to the loss of 25% of total income, and for a duplex the loss is 50%. Rental housing providers have to pay for mortgages, property insurance, property taxes, maintenance and repairs for the entire building.

If passed, housing providers will be left with no other choice. Either they will need to raise rents on the remaining residents that are meeting their legal rent obligations or sell the entire building for redevelopment as a luxury property. More renters will be displaced, new renters will have to pay higher rents, and the County will permanently lose more naturally occurring affordable rental housing. At a minimum, small rental housing providers with 10 or fewer units should remain under the existing threshold of one month’s FMR.

Increasing the eviction threshold will only further delay an already extremely long and expensive eviction process without changing the end result of displacement of the renter. The sheriff’s department has recently told Supervisor Mitchell’s office that it is taking them 3 to 6 months to enforce an eviction lock-out order. This is on top of the average 6 months that it takes from filing an eviction action to receiving a judgement. As a result, rental housing providers are already being forced to lose an entire year’s worth of rent on top of tens of thousands of dollars in attorney’s fees and court costs, and unit turnover costs.

The County already has an Emergency Rent Relief Program (ERRP) for renters impacted by recent immigration enforcement activities. Any immigration impacted renters would be far better helped by participating in the second round of ERRP that will being receiving applications on February 9th as it will completely eliminate their rental debt rather than merely delaying payment or making rent uncollectible for property owners.

There has been NO DATA presented showing that creating a countywide eviction threshold would help a majority of renters. The County just ended the application period for the first round of its ERRP that provides rental assistance that includes assistance for renters impacted by recent immigration enforcement activities. The Department of Consumer and Business Affairs (DCBA) received over 4,600. How many applications were for renters impacted by recent immigration enforcement activities that had 3 months’ worth of FMR in accrued rental debt?

This motion proposes a new countywide “emergency” resolution with no end date. The County just last week on February 3rd passed a motion by Chair Hilda Solis and Supervisor Janice Hahn under their regular authority and with no urgency clause to revise the existing Rent Stabilization and Tenant Protection Ordinance (RSTPO) eviction threshold to two months’ worth FMR doubling it from the current one months’ worth of FMR. Why is this same issue now considered an “emergency” requiring countywide action that will override 88 cities City Councils? It is extremely irresponsible for the Board of Supervisors to pass a new countywide resolution without first allowing the prior revision to be implemented and obtain data from it as to its impact on renters, rental housing providers and the supply of affordable housing.

TAKE ACTION NOW!

We urge ALL rental housing providers throughout Los Angeles County to immediately email the full Board of Supervisors requesting that they reject Agenda Item 20. The motion would put the County and rental housing providers in serious legal jeopardy based on exist tenant anti-harassments ordinances and has no data to support it. Instead, the Board should allow last week’s motion by Chair Solis and Supervisor Hahn to become effective and collect data on its impacts before considering spreading a monetary eviction threshold across 88 incorporated cities overriding existing City Councils and increasing it to 3 months’ worth of FMR.

Please send the same written comments to the record at this link.
Request to Address the Board of Supervisors

Also, PLEASE ATTEND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING ON TUESDAY IN-PERSON, VIA ZOOM OR BY TELEPHONE!!! At this week’s meeting there were more than 12 tenant activist groups speaking with more than 30 speakers IN-PERSON. WE CAN ONLY WIN THIS FIGHT WITH DIRECT PARTICIPATON BY RENTAL HOUSING PROVIDERS! YOUR VOICE IS VITAL!!!

Board of Supervisors Meeting at 9:30 a.m.!!!

Attend In Person (Arrive no later than 8:00 a.m. as tenant groups will fill the seats)

Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration
Board Hearing Room 381B
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Upon arrival, sign up to address the Board on items on the posted agenda by:

Using the Kiosks outside and inside the Board Hearing Room
Using a cellular phone or device and the QR codes posted outside and inside the Board Hearing Room

When it is your turn to speak, your name will be called and displayed on the screen

Attend Online

Online System (via Webex App)
Visit www.bos.lacounty.gov to register (before or during the Board meeting) and join via the Webex app on a computer or device. You will be prompted to complete a brief registration form prior to connecting to the Board meeting.
Once connected, you will be placed in a “listening-only” queue.
Use the “Raise Hand” feature on your computer or device to be moved into a “speaking” queue when the item(s) you wish to address is called. You will hear a “beep.” Please wait to speak until the host calls on you.
When it's your turn to speak, you will hear your name.
When your time expires, your line will be muted, and you will be placed in the “listening-only” queue.
NOTE: Please ensure to grant audio access (App or browser) to use the microphone. If you have technical difficulties, you may Participate by Phone to connect to the Board meeting. For additional instructions and tips, please view the Remote Participation Instructions: Webex: How to Register and Join

Attend by Telephone

To address the Board by phone, use the Telephone Number, Participant Access Code, and Meeting Password provided on the website or agenda, starting at 9:00 a.m. to connect to the Board meeting. NOTE: The Call-In information can change from meeting to meeting.
Once connected, you will be placed in a “listening-only” queue.
Press *3 on your phone to be moved to the “speaking” queue when the item(s) you wish to address is called. You will hear, “You have raised your hand to ask a question.” Please wait to speak until the host calls on you.
When it is your turn to speak, you will hear “Your line is unmuted”, your area code and the first three digits of your phone number.
When your time expires, your line will be muted, and you will be placed in the “listening-only” queue.

10/01/2025

Important Info for Buyer's using SBA Financing:

As of September 30, 2025, Congress has not passed a funding bill, and a government shutdown is set to begin today, Wednesday, October 1, 2025. While the duration is uncertain, we want to provide clarity on how this will affect SBA 504 lending and your client transactions.

What You Need to Know:
Statewide CDC remains open for business & accepting new applications.
The October loan funding / debenture sale will proceed as scheduled.
CDCs cannot submit new loans nor 327 (post SBA loan authorization) change actions for approval during the shutdown; however, CDC staff will continue to work on all loan requests in preparation to submit when SBA is back in operation.
Loan Servicing will continue for previously closed and funded loans.
We will share updated SBA guidance as soon as it becomes available.
What You Should Do:
Adjust Purchase Agreements: Encourage clients to extend close dates to allow extra time for SBA approvals once operations resume.
Communicate Proactively: Lenders should share this update with borrowers and CRE brokers to set clear expectations.
Stay Connected: Keep open lines of communication with our team and your project partners.
Watch for Updates: We will continue to provide timely alerts as the situation develops.

Address

180 N Riverview Drive, Unit 320
Anaheim, CA
92808

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 6pm
Tuesday 8am - 6pm
Wednesday 8am - 6pm
Thursday 8am - 6pm
Friday 8am - 6pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when G & S Group KW Commercial posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share