Stop Solar Farms DeKalb County - Indiana

06/16/2026

We love our farmers. Thank you for building a legacy for generations to come.

06/06/2026

This was sent to us to share. It appears that OnCore is attempting to revive the plans for the project previously referred to as Classic City Solar; the same project that would have been owned by Leeward and covered hundreds of acres between SDI and St. Joe.

What is frustrating is that DeKalb County citizens have already spoken. During the comprehensive plan rewrite process, citizens overwhelmingly expressed opposition for large scale solar development and a desire to protect agriculture land.

Yet here we are again.

The developers may change names, ownership, and marketing strategies, but the answer from DeKalb County residents remains the same: No.

06/06/2026

This is a great read.

When those who stand to profit from industrial solar try to convince you that these projects benefit you, ask them one simple question - HOW?

If you don't want to read the entire article, skim over the highlights below.

https://theblackfordledger.com/article/powering-indiana-paying-more-why-blackford-county-s-renewable-energy-boom-isn-t-lowering-local-bills

📌 The power generated from these projects enter a regional grid. The sales pitch of "we can power # # # homes with this project" is a sound bite to get people to accept the project.

📌 Homeowners still pay for transmission, infrastructure, grid upgrades, and utility profits.

📌 Counties "may" gain tax revenue and landowners DO receive lease payments, but average residents (us) see increased electric bills instead of savings.

📌 After years of large-scale renewable development across the Midwest, lower local electric rates remain largely a promise rather than a documented outcome.

Wind and solar projects are being built across Blackford County. None of the electricity is staying here — and Indiana power bills keep going up, not down. This is the third article in a series on Bla…

05/28/2026

We always love learning. Who wants to go listen to the "neutral" solar discussion with us? Brought to you by RWE.

04/23/2026

I made this last week and forgot to post it.

03/17/2026

The largest pro solar argument is when people say "it’s their land." While that is true, the fincancial risk doesnt stay on their land.

Taxpayers subsidize construction, utilities request rate increases to build them, and when damage or lost generation happens, consumers can end up paying higher electric bills, all while the landowner keeps collecting their lease check.

Wheatfield, Indiana Solar Farm Devastated by Severe Storm: Assessing the Aftermath - Energy News Beat https://share.google/vWmUkpOc7stcqwsGi

03/12/2026

There are so many questions that still need answers.

1. Who pays to clean up the damage?

2. Does this type of damage impact the landowner’s lease agreement with the developer?

3. Where do the broken panels end up?

4. What are the long-term impacts to the land and groundwater from shattered panels and debris?

5. Will the infrastructure be replaced, and if so, how long will that process take?

6. What happens if the stability of our power grid becomes heavily dependent on sources that can be so extensively damaged by severe weather?

7. How are non-participating landowners compensated if debris damages their property?

8. Does the developer have access to taxpayer funds to help cover repair or cleanup costs?

9. Who pays for damage to participating landowners properties caused by these panels?

10. Do the rest of the solar fields continue producing energy while damaged panels are being repaired, or does the entire project become non-functional during that time?

And ultimately, the question many people are asking:

WAS IT WORTH IT?

Tornado damage is not unique to solar infrastructure. However, we also cannot ignore the possibility that the risks involved may outweigh the benefits. These are important questions our communities deserve answers to before more farmland is converted.

What a terrible mess.

03/11/2026

Pray for Wheatfield, IN. In Jasper County as they deal with devastation they didn't ask for.
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17AzLFSTXJ/

03/10/2026

DeKalb County is in a good position right now. Both candidates running for County Commissioner have publicly stated they oppose replacing productive farmland with utility-scale solar, and two of the three current commissioners have consistently voted and/or spoken out against utility-scale solar projects.

It’s good to see local leadership acknowledging how important farmland, rural character, and responsible development are to our county.

Learn more about the commissioner candidates and their positions here:

Dave Holt (he has actively fought against utility scale solar along side us for several years): https://www.facebook.com/share/1BLAy8sZVQ/

Terry Yarde (he just posted his opposition to utility scale solar on his social media campaign page): https://www.facebook.com/share/1LVmD3bWwZ/

03/04/2026

Sculpin, we warned you about lying. You posted yesterday saying solar projects don't drive up electricity bills.

Funny story - we already have a solar surcharge on our electric bill for a project that isn't even in our county.

Another funny story - in 2023 there was a rate increase request submitted to the regulatory commission for YOUR project.

But, we should trust you, right?! Shame on you.