06/18/2026
Let’s Talk Deception: “We Buy Houses for Cash”
What Nobody Tells You About Novation and Assignment Sales
Every homeowner in Fort Wayne has heard the pitch by now. The postcards. The text messages from numbers you do not recognize. The phone call that comes in once a day, sometimes twice, always with the same line. We buy houses for cash. Sell it as is. No repairs, no hassle, close whenever you want.
People are exhausted by it. I hear about it almost daily from people who know what I do for a living, as if they need to apologize to me for the industry. Another postcard today. Another call during dinner. It has become background noise in this state, and it has quietly worn down how people think about real estate professionals in general, even though most of the people making those calls are not licensed, are not bound by any fiduciary duty, and are not, in almost every case, the person who will ever actually own the house.
Here is what that pitch usually means underneath the surface.
There is a corner of the real estate world that operates entirely outside the rules everyone assumes apply to buying and selling a house. No license required. No fiduciary duty. No errors and omissions insurance. No regulatory body to call when something goes wrong.
It is called novation, sometimes assignment of contract, and it has grown into an entire industry built on a simple structure. Someone gets a property under contract with the actual owner. They never intend to buy it themselves. Instead they market that contract, or the rights within it, to someone else for a higher price than they agreed to pay, and they keep the difference.
It is legal. Contract law has allowed parties to assign their rights in an agreement to a third party for centuries. Real estate licensing law regulates people who broker transactions or represent someone's interests for compensation. A person who gets a contract and resells their position in it is, legally, just reselling their own contractual rights, not acting as a broker. That is the loophole, and it is wide enough to drive a truck through.
"We buy houses for cash" rarely means what it sounds like
The phrase suggests someone is about to show up with money in hand and solve your problem on the spot. What it usually means is something different. Someone wants to get your house under contract at a price low enough that they can resell their position in that contract to someone else for more, and keep the spread. The person who eventually closes on your home, the actual end buyer, may never have set foot in your state. They may be an investor working off a spreadsheet two states away, or in some cases someone overseas, participating entirely through a phone and a wire transfer.
That is not automatically a scam. But it means the friendly person sitting across your kitchen table, explaining how easy this is going to be, is very likely not the person who will ever own your house, and has no legal obligation to make sure you understood what it was actually worth before you signed.
I have watched this play out from both sides of the table.
A transaction with no center of gravity
A few months ago I represented a young couple buying their first home. They loved the area. They could see past some deferred maintenance because the price and location were right.
The listing agent was based out of Indianapolis. He had never been to the property. He had been brought the deal by an investor client of his who specializes in exactly this kind of transaction, someone with no license, no fiduciary obligation to anyone, and a business that turned out to be barely solvent.
Picture the chain. There was the actual owner of the house. There was the person who held the contractual right to sell it, who had never lived in it and never intended to. There was a small team behind that person handling logistics. There was a listing agent two hours away who had never set foot on the property. And there was me, representing the buyers, trying to get a thirty year old house through inspection and to a closing table.
Nobody put a sign in the yard. Someone paid a handyman to install a lockbox. That was the extent of the in person attention the property received from the seller's side.
The shed nobody could open
During inspection we found a locked shed, roughly twelve by sixteen feet, that nobody had a key to. We asked. The contract holder said he did not have access because he did not actually own the property. The real owner eventually said he would bring a key. He brought the wrong one.
We never got into that shed before closing. Through gaps in the door we could see it was full, and a reasonable contractor estimate put removal at six to eight hundred dollars depending on what was inside.
My buyers did not want to inherit someone else's storage problem. So I wrote an addendum making clear the seller's side remained responsible for clearing the shed within ten days of closing, with funds held in escrow from the inspection negotiation to cover it. Everyone signed. Everyone agreed it was reasonable.
Then everyone on the other side disappeared.
Who do you even call
I called the listing agent. He routed me to an assistant on the investor's side. That assistant eventually told me, sounding worn down, that the company did not have the money to cover a small remaining repair item, under four hundred dollars, and that he and another employee were going to personally cover it themselves rather than let the deal die or face their boss.
Two people who were not the owner of the house, not licensed, and not contractually obligated to my clients in any way, paid out of their own pockets to keep a transaction together.
Meanwhile the escrowed repair funds sat with the title company. There was an overage, the normal cushion built in to make sure repairs are fully covered. When it came time to return that overage, the title company could not get a clear answer from anyone about who was authorized to receive it. Not the real owner. Not the contract holder. Not the team behind him. It took six more weeks to sort out.
My contractor, a one man operation who took the job on my word and our relationship, went six weeks unpaid for completed work because nobody on the other side of the transaction had the authority, the obligation, or apparently the basic organization to close out a file.
That deal closed. It closed because I have a relationship with that contractor that survived an unpaid six weeks, and because two employees on the other side dipped into their own pockets rather than let their company's failure become my buyers' problem. None of that should have been necessary. It would not have been necessary if a licensed person with fiduciary obligations had been on the other side of that table from the beginning.
Another deal, another disappearing act
This is not an isolated case. I have a similar story from a property a couple hours from here. I was brought in on what looked like a straightforward sale. The deeper I got into it the more the actual structure revealed itself. Someone out of state was marketing the deal. The real authority sat with a company several layers removed from her. The original seller had likely been found through cold calling or direct mail, the kind of high volume outreach that eventually catches someone on a vulnerable day.
By the time I found a legitimate cash buyer, someone who actually read the documents and caught real issues with title language and municipal liens, I had done essentially everything a licensed broker does. Photos. Showings. Negotiation. Coordination with the title company, the county, the recorder, code enforcement.
Then I was told there was no money to compensate me for any of it. Not because anyone discovered the economics late. The spread had been known from the start. I simply was never told there was nothing in it for me until after the work was done.
The buyer in that deal, the actual end purchaser with no stake in protecting the people who structured the transaction, ended up being the most ethical person in the entire chain. He paid me himself once he understood what had happened. The irony of that has never left me.
What every seller and buyer should understand
In a normal real estate transaction there is one owner and at least one licensed professional on each side bound by fiduciary duty, continuing education requirements, and errors and omissions insurance. If something goes wrong, there is a license on the line and a regulatory body you can call.
In a novation or assignment deal there can be a real owner, a contract holder who has never seen the property, a team of unlicensed people behind that contract holder, and sometimes further layers of assignment stacked on top of that. Not one person in that chain may owe you any legal duty of care. When something goes wrong, a locked shed, an unpaid repair, a seller who was never told what their home was actually worth before they signed away their equity, there may be no one whose job it is to answer for it.
If someone other than a licensed Realtor is the one structuring your purchase or sale, ask them directly who legally owns the property right now and who is responsible if something goes wrong before closing. If you do not get a straight, confident answer, that is your answer.
I have been doing this in Fort Wayne for twelve years, with my name on every transaction and a license that holds me accountable for it. If you are thinking about selling, especially if someone has approached you directly with an offer that sounds too convenient to be true, call me before you sign anything.
That conversation is free. Finding out who actually owned your house after the fact is not.
David Barlag Fort Wayne Realtor, Century 21 Bradley Realty 260-750-5737 davidbarlag.com
https://davidbarlagagentbuyer.carrot.com/blog/lets-talk-deception-we-buy-houses-for-cash/
