NO IMTT

NO IMTT Grassroots effort by the tax paying citizens of St. Charles Parish to stop IMTT expansion

05/22/2026

๐Ÿƒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ท๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐˜€. ๐Ÿƒ

๐Ÿ‘‘ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ขโ‚‚ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ท๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ž๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎโ€™๐˜€ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฒ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ถ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€. ๐ŸŽญ

Steve Scalise, chairman of the โ€œ๐— ๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ž๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ฒโ€ โ€” a private organization made up of ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ โ€” selected ๐—ช. ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ to reign as ๐—ž๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ถ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€ and hosted the ball where Stream was crowned King.

๐ŸŽฒ ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ.

Letโ€™s take a guess who heโ€™s pickinโ€™.

๐Ÿƒ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—ตโ€ฆ โ€œ๐—๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„โ€? ๐Ÿƒ

๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€:

โ“ ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐—๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฎ? โ“

Do we really need Washington, D.C., the governor, industry, and the political establishment telling Louisiana who to vote for?

โ™ ๏ธ โ™ฆ๏ธ ๐——๐—ผ ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—บ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ? โ™ฃ๏ธ โ™ฅ๏ธ

Because the same names keep appearing over and over.

๐—๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ณ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฎ.

๐Ÿญ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—–๐—ฆ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฎ.

๐Ÿ›๏ธ ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฎ.

๐ŸŽญ Letโ€™s think about this.

๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ช. ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ โ€” ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—š๐˜‚๐—น๐—ณ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป, ๐—ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜† ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—น๐˜† ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ท๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—–๐—ขโ‚‚ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ โ€” ๐—ž๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎโ€™๐˜€ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ถ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€. ๐Ÿ‘‘

Then you start looking a little deeper into the circle.

๐—๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ณ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐˜† appointed ๐—ช. ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ to the Louisiana Economic Development Partnership (LEDP), through the ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต๐˜„๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—˜๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐——๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ tied directly to the ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ฟ.

According to ๐—๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ณ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐˜†, soon to be the ๐—ก๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ข๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—Ÿ๐—ก๐—š ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—œ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ฑ.

๐ŸŒŽ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต๐˜„๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ? ๐ŸŒŽ

The same industrial corridor tied to:
โ€ข LNG expansion
โ€ข petrochemical growth
โ€ข major pipeline infrastructure
โ€ข massive power demand
โ€ข data center growth
โ€ข expanding CCS development

๐Ÿ›๏ธ ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐——๐—ฃ?

๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—–-๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—”๐—ง๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—œ๐—ฃ helping execute Louisianaโ€™s industrial and energy strategy.

But hereโ€™s the problem.

๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐——๐—ฃ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€ โ€œ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐโ€ ๐—ฎ๐˜€:
โ€ข Jeff Landry
โ€ข LEDP
โ€ข LED
โ€ข state government

โ“ ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ โ€œ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒโ€? โ“

โ€ข industrial interests
โ€ข developers
โ€ข investors
โ€ข CCS companies
โ€ข the same people financially connected to these projects

๐—ฆ๐—ข ๐—ช๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐——๐—ข ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—จ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—”๐—ก๐—” ๐—–๐—œ๐—ง๐—œ๐—ญ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—™๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—œ๐—ก ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ โ€œ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—–-๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—”๐—ง๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—œ๐—ฃโ€?

๐—œ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ฒ, ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต:
โ€ข pipelines
โ€ข injection wells
โ€ข eminent domain fights
โ€ข subsurface land battles
โ€ข long-term liability

๐Ÿ’ฐ ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ช๐—˜ ๐—š๐—˜๐—ง ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฌ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ. ๐Ÿ’ฐ

๐—ช๐—›๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐—ก๐—ก๐—˜๐—–๐—ง๐—˜๐—— ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—™๐—œ๐—ง ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—  ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—จ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐——๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง.

And hereโ€™s where the picture gets even clearer.

In 2024, the same legislature created LEDP under Act 590 to help execute ๐—๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ณ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ โ€œ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎโ€ ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐˜† ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐˜† โ€” the very LEDP ๐—๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ณ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐˜† appointed W. Gray Stream to.

In that same session, Louisiana legislators passed HB 966 strengthening and expanding Louisianaโ€™s CCS unitization and storage framework.

And who authored HB 966?

๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜ ๐—š๐—ฒ๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป, ๐——๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ โ€” ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต๐˜„๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป.

At the same time Louisiana was building an economic development machineโ€ฆ

that same public-private partnership structure was expanding the legal framework for industrial-scale COโ‚‚ injection and storage tied to ๐—ง๐—”๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—ฅ-๐—•๐—”๐—–๐—ž๐—˜๐—— ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฑ๐—ค ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—•๐—ฆ๐—œ๐——๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฆ.

And who is the Senate candidate they are all backing?

๐—๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„.

The same ๐—๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—”๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต, who works with Jones Walker โ€” one of the largest Louisiana-based law firms with an Energy Transition practice focused on carbon capture, energy, and major industrial interests.

โ“ ๐—œ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜„๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—ผ ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ต? โ“

So Louisiana citizens should probably start asking whoโ€™s really benefiting from this system.

๐ŸŽฏ ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผโ€™๐˜€ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ธ? ๐ŸŽฏ

Because this is not a conspiracy theory.

๐Ÿ”„ ๐—œ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ. ๐Ÿ”„

The same names.
The same political networks.
The same industry interests.
The same economic development structure.
The same policies.
The same projects.

๐ŸŽญ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ถ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ปโ€™๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—น๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—ฎ ๐—บ๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ธ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ฒ (๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€, ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€). ๐ŸŽญ

๐Ÿƒ ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—” ๐—ช๐—œ๐—–๐—ž๐—˜๐—— ๐—ช๐—˜๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜๐—ฌ ๐—ช๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜. ๐Ÿƒ

๐ŸŽฒ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜†โ€™๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€โ€ฆ ๐ŸŽฒ

๐Ÿ’ฐ ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜โ€ฆ ๐Ÿ’ฐ

๐Ÿƒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ฒโ€™๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด. ๐Ÿƒ

04/27/2026

WHY WE ARE WASTING THIS MOMENT?

The Strait of Hormuz is closed. 20% of the worldโ€™s oil supply is cut off. Global LNG prices are up 140%. U.S. LNG exports just hit near-record levels. Louisiana exports 61% of all U.S. LNG.

This is Louisianaโ€™s moment.

So why are they burying the ground instead of drilling it?

Right now, Europe and Asia are desperate for U.S. natural gas. Theyโ€™re paying premium prices.
Louisiana has the Haynesville Shale. The Gulf infrastructure. The ports. The workforce.

The global market is screaming: SEND US YOUR GAS.

Louisianaโ€™s response: weโ€™re filling the ground with COโ‚‚ waste instead.

Hereโ€™s the scam you need to understand. Theyโ€™re calling Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS) an โ€œenergyโ€ project. It is NOT.

CCS is a waste disposal operation. Corporations capture COโ‚‚ from their smokestacks and bury it permanently under Louisiana land.

No energy produced. No oil extracted. Just waste โ€” buried forever.

COโ‚‚ used in oil drilling (Enhanced Oil Recovery) = COโ‚‚ as a tool to produce MORE oil. Louisiana has done this for decades. It creates real value.

CCS geological sequestration = burying COโ‚‚ as industrial waste. Permanently. No oil. No gas. No energy. No value.

They are NOT the same thing. They are opposites.

So why is Louisiana doing it?
Federal 45Q tax credits pay corporations $85/ton to bury COโ‚‚ permanently underground.
Louisiana has 17+ qualifying CCS projects. Potential payout: $3.5 BILLION per year.

There is no market for the buried carbon. The money comes entirely from your federal tax dollars. Take away the tax subsidies and CCS folds like a cheap lawn chair.

Think about that.

While the Hormuz crisis creates a once-in-a-generation opportunity for Louisiana to produce and export real energy for real money, Louisiana is being turned into the worldโ€™s permanent COโ‚‚ dump, funded by your tax dollars, for corporations collecting federal welfare.

Itโ€™s time to stop calling waste disposal "clean energy" and start focusing on being the energy powerhouse the world actually needs.


Save My Louisiana Louisiana CO2 Alliance

04/26/2026
It has been brought to my attention that there is an active social media campaign being perpetrated by the powers to be,...
04/14/2026

It has been brought to my attention that there is an active social media campaign being perpetrated by the powers to be, pushing the carbon sequestration agenda.

The campaigns entire existence is to discredit and slander the general public that is against carbon sequestration, blue hydrogen, blue ammonia, the associated pipelines and imminent domain private land seizures.

They are using social media to flood our groups, sites, and pages with disinformation, conspiracy theories, in an attempt to make us look like crackpots and conspiracy theorists.

I encourage you to not fall into the trap of engaging with and spreading the fake news. Report, block, bane these accounts and stay in the fight of our lives. Literally!

THE GREAT AMERICAN FLEECING: HOW 45Q TAX CREDITS TURNED YOUR TAX DOLLARS INTO CORPORATE PROFITBy: Reneeโ€™ Savant Letโ€™s br...
03/10/2026

THE GREAT AMERICAN FLEECING: HOW 45Q TAX CREDITS TURNED YOUR TAX DOLLARS INTO CORPORATE PROFIT
By: Reneeโ€™ Savant

Letโ€™s break this wide open.
Youโ€™ve heard of corporate welfare, but have you heard of 45Q?
Itโ€™s a federal tax credit โ€” passed quietly, expanded repeatedly โ€” thatโ€™s now funneling billions of YOUR tax dollars into the pockets of Big Oil, Wall Street speculators, and foreign-owned carbon storage firms. All under the feel-good label of โ€œcarbon capture.โ€
Hereโ€™s how the scam works:
โธป
STEP 1: Manufacture a โ€œClimate Crisis Solutionโ€
The fossil fuel industry cooked up an idea โ€” trap carbon before it hits the air, pipe it underground, and claim itโ€™s solving climate change. Never mind that:
โ€ข The tech is wildly unproven at scale,
โ€ข Projects have already leaked,
โ€ข And most of the COโ‚‚ goes to enhanced oil recovery (i.e. pump more oil).
But it sounds green, right?
โธป
STEP 2: Get Taxpayers to Pay for It
Enter Section 45Q โ€” a tax credit worth up to $85โ€“$180 per ton of COโ‚‚ โ€œcaptured.โ€
They promised innovation. What they delivered?
โ€ข Pipeline invasions of private land,
โ€ข Risky injection wells near water tables,
โ€ข And zero obligation to prove the COโ‚‚ stays buried long-term.
โธป
STEP 3: Cash In, Disappear
The companies behind CCS are often LLCs, built to take your money, drill your land, and vanish.
If the project leaks? If the company folds?
You, the taxpayer, hold the bag.
This isnโ€™t innovation โ€” itโ€™s legalized looting.
โธป
WHOโ€™S PROFITING?
โ€ข Exxon. Denbury. Oxy.
โ€ข Hedge funds. Carbon traders.
โ€ข A network of lobbyists and politicians who look the other way while your money fuels this dangerous shell game.
โธป
AND LOUISIANA?
Weโ€™re the ground zero for this scam โ€” with more Class VI COโ‚‚ injection wells proposed than anywhere else in the country.
Why?
Because our land is cheap. Our leaders are bought. And our people are expected to stay quiet.
โธป
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
This is not climate action.
This is not economic development.
This is the greatest taxpayer heist of our generation, wrapped in a green bow.
Share this. Talk about this. Demand accountability.
If 45Q isnโ€™t stopped, your land, your water, and your future will be sold for tax credits โ€” and youโ€™ll be left with the consequences.

02/04/2026

๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ What do YOU want a deep dive on next?

COโ‚‚ Chronicles has over 100 files covering just about every topic you can think of โ€” and weโ€™re not here to guess what matters mostโ€ฆ

We want to deliver the stories YOU actually want to read.

โœ… CCS Projects
โœ… Lobbyist Corruption
โœ… 2026 Legislative Session
โœ… Taxpayer Rip-Offs
โœ… Secret Donors
โœ… Election Updates

๐Ÿ‘‡ Drop your vote in the comments (or suggest a topic we didnโ€™t list).
Weโ€™re listening โ€” and weโ€™re digging.

01/18/2026

MUST READ by EVERY Louisiana Citizen

What Happens to the CCS Story When No One Is Being Paid?

Louisianans have been told, repeatedly and confidently, that carbon capture and storage (CCS) is safe, necessary, and essential to our economic future. Much of that confidence has come from one respected source: the LSU Center for Energy Studies.

But a recent, unfunded LSU law review article quietly exposes a problem no one seems eager to address.

When CCS is analyzed without industry money, the certainty disappears.

The article, written by a graduating LSU law student and published in the LSU Journal of Energy Law & Resources, was not commissioned, sponsored, or grant-funded. It wasnโ€™t produced for industry, the state, or an advocacy group. It was simple academic legal scholarship.

And that matters.

Because what emerges from the unpaid analysis looks very different from the polished assurances Louisianans have grown accustomed to hearing.

The law student does not claim CCS is low-risk.
She does not argue that it is inevitable.
She does not declare it essential for Louisianaโ€™s future.

Instead, she documents unresolved groundwater concerns, long-term monitoring uncertainty, shifting liability to the state, and the steady erosion of parish authority over projects imposed from Baton Rouge.

Most revealing of all, the article never clearly answers a fundamental question:

Why must Louisiana continue hosting CCS projects if national and international climate mandates weaken or collapse?

That question hangs unansweredโ€”because there is no obvious answer.

Contrast that with the tone coming from publicly funded and industry-adjacent commentary, including voices associated with the LSU Center for Energy Studies and figures such as Dr. Greg Upton. In those discussions, CCS is framed as economically inevitable, scientifically settled, and environmentally manageable. Risk is minimized. Opposition is often treated as misunderstanding or fear.

What is rarely addressed with the same confidence is who pays when something goes wrong decades from now, what happens when tax credits expire, or why Louisiana should permanently assume subsurface and water risk for carbon dioxide generated in other states.

One justification that still surfacesโ€”sometimes explicitly, sometimes by implication- is that CCS is necessary to keep Louisiana competitive with Europe.

But that argument no longer holds up.

The United States is not bound by European climate enforcement mechanisms. The EUโ€™s carbon border rules do **not** require Louisiana-hosted sequestration. No trade agreement obligates this state to serve as a long-term carbon repository for international markets. Much of the CCS justification still rests on Paris Agreementโ€“era assumptions that may not survive the next political cycle.

If those assumptions disappear, what remains?

What remains is this: Louisiana communities are being asked to accept permanent subsurface risk, long-term liability, and loss of local controlโ€”often with little direct benefitโ€”based on policies and incentives that are far from permanent.

This is not an accusation against LSU or its researchers. Universities play a vital role in policy discussion. But incentives matter. Funding shapes framing. And when the money leaves the room, the tone changes.

Unpaid scholarship doesnโ€™t cheerlead. It documents. It hedges. It acknowledges uncertainty. And in this case, it quietly reveals that CCS is far less settled than Louisianans have been led to believe.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Read the full article here:
https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/jelr/article/1331/&path_info=8_Miller.pdf

10/21/2025

Refined Community Empowerment Meeting - September 24, 2025Mt. Zion Baptist Church, St. Rose, LouisianaJoin Refined Community Empowerment and the community as...

10/11/2025

Part 1: The Water We Cannot Lose A glass of water sits on the kitchen table in Acadiana. Clear, cool,

09/19/2025

๐ŸŒ Carbon Capture Goes Global โ€” And Louisianaโ€™s Leaders Sell Us Out

Across Europe and Asia, CCS is scaling fast with massive hubs, shared pipelines, and billions in government investment. While the world celebrates โ€œinnovation,โ€ Louisianaโ€™s reality is far different.

On September 15th, eight members of the Vernon Parish Police Jury voted to support CCS projects, opening the door for industry while leaving residents with more questions than answers. Instead of defending parish landowners and aquifers, they sided with industry promises.

And where is state leadership? Nowhere to be found. The Office of Conservation already proved this on September 9th, when they held a hidden hearing in Baton Rouge without public notice, undermining trust and transparency at every turn. Meanwhile, Louisiana is being branded a โ€œCCS hubโ€ โ€” not because of smart planning, but because our leaders are willing to gamble with our land and water.

โœ… Who guarantees our aquifers wonโ€™t be poisoned?
โœ… Who defends landowners from eminent domain?
โœ… Who ensures safety comes before corporate tax credits?

And letโ€™s be clear: the ultimate responsibility sits with Governor Jeff Landry. He has a duty to ensure that the one water source feeding 15 parishes has zero chance of contamination. Anything less is a betrayal of the people he serves.

Dustin Davidson, as the new head of the Department of Natural Resources, must also understand his role. It is not to shield corporations or stage backroom deals โ€” it is to notify and protect the people of Louisiana.

We will never accept another hidden hearing in Baton Rouge, such as the one held on September 9th at the Office of Conservation. Our communities deserve transparency. They deserve honesty. They deserve leaders who put land, water, and people above profit.

Louisiana can move forward โ€” but not by sacrificing its people in the process. The people deserve better.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Read the global CCS article here, then ask yourself: if the world is building CCS with safeguards, why is Louisiana moving recklessly without them?

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Carbon-Capture-is-Finally-Going-Mainstream.html

The COโ‚‚ Chronicles was built for this moment โ€” to dig where others wonโ€™t, to uncover what theyโ€™d rather keep quiet, and to give Louisianaโ€™s people the facts that industry and politicians wonโ€™t put on the record.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Follow COโ‚‚ Chronicles today for deep, independent coverage you wonโ€™t find anywhere else. Because if we donโ€™t tell these stories, no one will.

08/12/2025

IMPORTANT!
These projects are driven by federal subsidies, not market demand.
In Louisiana, โ€œblue hydrogenโ€ โ€” made from natural gas โ€” produces massive COโ‚‚ emissions. That COโ‚‚ has to go somewhere, and thatโ€™s where Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) comes in. Inject the COโ‚‚ underground, and corporations can claim the lucrative 45Q tax credit, worth up to $85 per metric ton stored. Over a decade, thatโ€™s billions in guaranteed payouts from U.S. taxpayers.
These arenโ€™t industries built to last. Theyโ€™re subsidy pipelines:
Profits flow out of Louisiana to multinational corporations.
Environmental liability stays here, buried in our land and under our waterways.

Send a message to learn more

Address

911 Ormond Boulevard
Luling, LA
70070

Telephone

+19856034111

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when NO IMTT posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to NO IMTT:

Share

Category