Protect Our Homes - Saugus - Opposition of Project at 20 Bennett Highway

Protect Our Homes - Saugus - Opposition of Project at 20 Bennett Highway Page to organize opposition of development at 20 Bennett Highway, Saugus, MA

04/24/2026

Update from recent ZBA meeting, Thursday, April 24th re: 20 Bennett Hwy 40B permits, ZBA voted to postpone the discussion another 30 days. It will continue to be postponed every meeting until the courts make a decision on the appeal to the Safe Harbor motion that Saugus ZBA invoked. Until such notice, it's a wait & see game until a decision is made by the court. Speculation by the ZBA Chairman Tom Traverse is that "it will be a lengthy period until a ruling will be made; approximately 8-9 months". If any updates, changes or rulings are made during this time, we will post that information as soon as it's made aware.
The residents managing this page are deeply vested in this matter and will continue to monitor it very closely. Thank you for your continued support, advice, thoughts, comments and general attention to this matter!

NEXT MEETING IS THIS THURSDAY! 4/23 at 7pm at Town Hall Annex, 25 Main Street, Saugus.It is incredibly important that we...
04/19/2026

NEXT MEETING IS THIS THURSDAY! 4/23 at 7pm at Town Hall Annex, 25 Main Street, Saugus.

It is incredibly important that we show up with big numbers to show the developer and Town that we are opposed to this project. We look forward to seeing many new faces on Thursday!

04/08/2026

Developer files appeal against safe harbor in Saugus

April 7, 2026 by Elizabeth Della Piana

SAUGUS — It has been confirmed that the developer of the 20 Rear Bennett Highway apartment project has filed an appeal with the Housing Appeals Committee against the safe harbor appeal made by the Zoning Board of Appeals.

The Board originally announced it would file for safe harbor at a Jan. 22 meeting and later, at a March 26 meeting, announced that the Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities upheld the appeal. However, the developer had until Tuesday, April 7, to file for an appeal.

Safe harbor allows a municipality to temporarily deny or restrict comprehensive permit applications for affordable housing developments without facing state-level appeals.

Now, the developer has the opportunity to state their case in their own appeal.

If the safe harbor claim prevails, the matter is returned to the Board, and it could deny the project. However, if the developer prevails, the matter is remanded to the Board, and the public hearing

The land which they are trying to develop spans across the Saugus border into Revere. We heard their plan for a 40B apar...
03/30/2026

The land which they are trying to develop spans across the Saugus border into Revere. We heard their plan for a 40B apartment complex development on the Saugus property. Now we have learned what they intend to use the adjacent Revere property for:

“The plan for Muzzey Street is an industrial-sized facility that will house dozens of lithium-ion batteries that store electricity to be used to support the grid. The system stores power from the grid and renewable energy sources and discharges that power during peak demand.”

It is important that our elected Saugus representatives are informed about this and contact their colleagues in Revere to continue advocacy for the affected Saugus residents.

Safety concerns quoted from this article:

“She went on to say that the industrial-sized facility will have 57 batteries and if there were a fire, it would create toxic fumes. ‘This project deserves transparency. We deserve better,’ O’Hara told the council.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, BESS fires create problems for first responders due to the difficulty of extinguishing lithium-ion battery fires. The EPA also warns there are potential health impacts from emissions and a need to properly dispose of contaminated burned batteries. […]

The Electric Power Research Institute tracks information on BESS fires and incidents. Since it was launched, the EPRI has documented numerous incidents, particularly following high-profile fires in South Korea and the United States. A 2024 fire at the Gateway Energy Storage Facility in San Diego, California, involved 15,000 lithium-ion batteries and saw flare-ups for several days. In Chandler, Arizona, a containerized unit burned for more than 10 days, requiring continual cooling. Warwick, New York, saw two days of fire from batteries, which reports suggested were affected by the weather.”

Council Seeks Fire Safety Briefing on Proposed Battery Storage Facility

By Barbara Taormina

The Revere City Council unanimously supported a motion presented by Councillor-at-Large Michelle Kelley at this week’s meeting calling on Fire Chief James Cullen and Captain Kevin O’Hara to appear before the City Council to provide a public safety briefing regarding the proposed Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) facility on Muzzey Street.
“This is not a proposal the City Council will vote on,” said Kelley, explaining that the systems are protected under the Dover Amendment, a state zoning law that limits how cities and towns can use zoning to control certain land uses.
The plan for Muzzey Street is an industrial-sized facility that will house dozens of lithium-ion batteries that store electricity to be used to support the grid. The system stores power from the grid and renewable energy sources and discharges that power during peak demand.
“This motion is not about taking a position on the project,” said Kelley. “It’s about assuring public safety.”
According to state officials, battery energy storage systems are an emerging technology that will decrease utility bills, make the grid more reliable and enable the region to use renewable energy more efficiently. But the systems are meeting increasing opposition from residents who don’t want the facilities in their communities.
During the public comment segment of the council meeting, Beach Street resident Corey O’Hara expressed her opposition to the project. “I want to get this out, so the public knows what’s going on… At this point, I don’t think anybody in the public knows about this project,” said O’Hara.
She went on to say that the industrial-sized facility will have 57 batteries and if there were a fire, it would create toxic fumes. “This project deserves transparency. We deserve better,” O’Hara told the council.
According to the Environmental Protection Agency, BESS fires create problems for first responders due to the difficulty of extinguishing lithium-ion battery fires. The EPA also warns there are potential health impacts from emissions and a need to properly dispose of contaminated burned batteries. However, the EPA also notes that despite some high-profile incidents, improvements in BESS quality and design have led to a decrease in the number of failure incidents.
The Electric Power Research Institute tracks information on BESS fires and incidents. Since it was launched, the EPRI has documented numerous incidents, particularly following high-profile fires in South Korea and the United States. A 2024 fire at the Gateway Energy Storage Facility in San Diego, California, involved 15,000 lithium-ion batteries and saw flare-ups for several days. In Chandler, Arizona, a containerized unit burned for more than 10 days, requiring continual cooling. Warwick, New York, saw two days of fire from batteries, which reports suggested were affected by the weather. The EPRI also noted that from 2018 to 2023 there was a 97percent drop in BESS failure rates.
“When this came to light, all the questions I got were about fires, fire safety, hazardous material,” said Ward 4 Councillor Paul Argenzio, who commended the motion.
Ward 3 Councillor Anthony Cogliandro said he will be happy to hear from the fire department about the proposed facility. He said Flatiron Energy, the company that will develop the facility, is planning a full presentation for the council. “We’ll do our part to bring transparency to this,” said Cogliandro.
Councillor-at-Large Marc Silvestri said he spoke with the attorney for Flatiron Energy. Silvestri said the company will provide all the necessary training and equipment the Revere Fire Department would need to suppress a fire at the facility. Silvestri said he also learned that the batteries would be housed in self-contained units to prevent any spread of fire.
Ward 5 Councillor Angela Guarino-Sawaya focused on the motion and public safety. “We owe it to residents to ensure every precaution is in place,” she said.
The council was concerned about more than BESS safety and technology. City Council President Anthony Zambuto seemed undecided about which is more disagreeable, lithium-ion batteries or the Dover Amendment.
“We’ve seen this more and more, where decisions are driven at the state level and the role of local government is more limited than people expect,” said Kelley, referring to the amendment.
The amendment emerged from a 1951 case involving the Town of Dover, which was using zoning bylaws to keep religious schools out of residential neighborhoods. The Legislature stepped in and created laws that protect religious, educational and agricultural land uses from zoning regulations.
Silvestri said he wanted to see how the BESS project was protected under a law meant to shield religious, educational and agricultural uses. But over time the Legislature has expanded the Dover Amendment to include projects in sync with the state’s agenda and policies. Solar energy land uses are now protected under the Dover Amendment.
“The Dover Amendment is not settled law as of yet,” said Kelley, who added that legislation coming in June or July will require BESS projects to go before a state siting board.
The council voted to hold a public hearing with Fire Department officials.

CUTLINE:

Michelle Kelley
Councillor-at-Large

03/29/2026

Come take a walk down our neighborhood, Hood Street. The Street highlighted by the 20 Bennett Hwy LLC development, which plans to become an access road to the former Weylu's property.

Some facts about Hood Street:
- 21 homes are located on Hood Street. Most were originally built between 1910-1955. The primary foundations of these residential properties are fieldstone.
- Hood Street spans a length of 405 yds x 18ft in width. Not uncommon to see a delivery or emergency vehicle perform a multi-point turn to exit this street.
- 6 telephone poles. Cables and electrical wires that connect each telephone pole average height is 11ft from the ground.
- 4 trees
- one fire hydrant, which is located at the base (bottom) end of the street.
- Sidewalks along both sides of the street are either broken or un-leveled from settling and/or tree roots.
- 3 catch basins and storm drains. During times of heavy rain, these basins and drains over flood parts of the street.

At the :34 mark of this video, the drone starts to pan along the developers rock ledge that directly empties into Hood Street. This is the area that the developers propose to eliminate and scale down to make a connecting access road from their property onto Hood Street. This rock ledge measures an elevated height of 50ft from the street level and is entirely made of granite. Five homes directly abutt the developer's property on Hood Street. The closest is 6ft away from the elevated rock ledge.

The court upheld the town’s safe harbor claim. The developer now has 20 days to appeal which brings them to a deadline o...
03/27/2026

The court upheld the town’s safe harbor claim. The developer now has 20 days to appeal which brings them to a deadline of April 7. The town’s attorney mentioned that although no appeal has been filed yet, he has spoken to the developer’s attorney who stated they plan to move forward with an appeal. We were informed an appeal could take between 6-9 months to decide.

We will know more about this possible appeal when it is discussed again at the April ZBA meeting.

SAUGUS — It was announced at Thursday night’s Zoning Board of Appeals meeting that the Housing Court upheld the Board’s decision to impose safe harbor on the plans for apartments at 20 Rear Bennett Highway, 29 Hood St., 0 Mildred St., and 0 Goldie St. The apartments would fall under Chapter 40...

03/20/2026
Discussion of the proposed project begins at 48 minutes, 45 seconds into the video.
03/20/2026

Discussion of the proposed project begins at 48 minutes, 45 seconds into the video.

Recorded & Streamed Live from Saugus Town Hall Auditorium.

Address

29 Hood Street
Saugus, MA
01906

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Protect Our Homes - Saugus - Opposition of Project at 20 Bennett Highway posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share

Category