02/06/2026
‼️GET ADVICE BEFORE YOU SIGN
🏡 When a Property Looks “Stunning”… But Isn’t
A Marina Da Gama home. A collapsed wooden deck. A 12 year court battle. And in the end — every claim was dismissed.
Here’s what YOU should know.
1. What actually happened
The buyers purchased a home described by the estate agent as being in “stunning condition”. Seven months after moving in, the upper wooden deck collapsed.
Experts later found:
• The decks had no approved plans
• They did not meet National Building Regulations
• The defects were latent — meaning a normal buyer would not have seen them
The buyers sued the agent and the seller. After hearing their evidence, the court dismissed all claims.
💬 2. “Stunning” is not a legal promise
Words like “stunning”, “beautiful”, or “lovely” are sales talk, not guarantees. They do not mean the structure is sound or compliant.
To be misrepresentation, a statement must be a verifiable fact, not an opinion.
The court found:
• The agent did not know about the hidden defects
• He had no duty to conduct technical or engineering investigations
• No misrepresentation existed
⚖️ 3. The voetstoots clause protected the seller
A voetstoots clause means the property is sold as is.
To defeat it, a buyer must prove:
1. The seller knew about the defect, and
2. The seller hid it on purpose to mislead the buyer
The buyers could not prove either. In fact, they described the seller as honest and unaware of any problems.
❌4. Their damages claim was also incorrect
Even if they had won, they claimed the wrong type of damages.
The law allows a buyer to claim a reduction in the purchase price (actio quanti minoris), not full replacement costs. Repair costs can help estimate the loss — but they are not the loss itself.
🧾 5. The real lesson for property buyers
• Puffery is not a promise
• Voetstoots is difficult to overcome
• Buyers must investigate properly before signing👁️
• Litigation is slow, expensive, and uncertain
12 years. 9 court days. Significant legal fees 💰Every claim dismissed.